CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, BAKERSFIELD
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
Advanced Studies Department
EDAD 682
Management and Development of Human Resources
Dr. Louis Wildman
Office: Education 237 661-654-3047(office)
Home: 13601 Morales Court 661-588-8865 (home)
Bakersfield, Calif. 93314 lwildman@csub.edu
THE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION THEME
Excellence—Integrity--Caring
CANDIDATE DISPOSITIONS
Candidates preparing to work in schools as teachers or other professional school personnel know and demonstrate the content, pedagogical, and professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn.
Professional Collaboration
Candidates will participate in action-oriented collaboration that will enable them to learn from others and provide leadership in partnerships with all stakeholders.
Reflective Practitioner
Candidates are reflective, life long learners who apply problem solving and critical thinking strategies and the respectful appreciation of differing points of view.
Ethical Professional
Candidates’ actions are based on accepted professional standards of conduct and reflect insight and awareness with respect to diverse perspectives, opinions, obligations and ethical responsibilities of the profession.
Student/Client Centered
Candidates, throughout their programs, will prioritize the needs of the students/clients they serve by maintaining trusting relationships built upon caring, nurturing (respective) and meaningful interactions.
Professional Leader
Candidates, throughout their programs, will be strong, determined, professional leaders with a clear instructional focus using effective communication skills and a willingness to take risks to ensure the advancement, safety, and welfare of all students in our communities.
Professional Competence
Candidates will maintain high programmatic outcomes that reflect research-based practices, principles of learning differentiation, and standards based instruction.
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
Effective use of human resources and long-range planning relating to recruitment and development at the school/district level will be emphasized. Programs for developing district management personnel as well as school-level personnel will be covered.
GOALS OF COURSE:
To develop understanding and skill in the utilization of the personnel processes of staff selection, supervision, evaluation, and staff development. To critically analyze techniques for accomplishing these personnel processes.
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
1. Candidates will have knowledge of components of systems to evaluate all certificated and classified staff. (Cognitive and Social) (CPSEL 2 and 3)
2. Candidates will be thoroughly familiar with statutes and techniques designed to structure evaluation of teaching and staff effectiveness and be able to implement them. (Cognitive and Social) (CPSEL 2)
3. Candidates will understand the staff development process of relating evaluation findings to appropriate adult educational strategies. (Cognitive, affective, and Social) (CPSEL 2)
4. Candidates will master skills that will enable them to collegially plan educational programs for adult learners. (Cognitive, Affective, and Social) (CPSEL 1)
5. Candidates will learn the means and rationale for integrating organizational goals with specific programs of adult learning and comprehensive programs of staff development. (Cognitive and Social) (CPSEL 4, 5, and 6)
6. Candidates will learn essential strategies for developing, implementing and evaluating staff development programs. (Cognitive, Affective, and Social) (CPSEL 2)
7. Candidates will learn a variety of staff utilization patterns which combine the needs and abilities of staff, organizational constraints, and available resources, and understand criteria for elective merit appropriate to address local needs. (Cognitive and Social) (CPSEL 1, 2, 4, and 5)
8. Candidates will possess the process skills and understand the importance of implementing effective personnel policies. (Affective and Social) (CPSEL 3)
9. Candidates will be able to implement long and short term procedures necessary for meeting staff needs. (Cognitive, Affective, and Social) (CPSEL 3)
10. Candidates will understand the inevitability of conflict at the school-site and district levels and develop strategies for early identification as well as conflict amelioration, to effectively and fairly conduct personnel grievance hearings. (Affective and Social) (CPSEL 2, 4, and 6)
PREMISE (including how this course deals with educational equity and cultural diversity):
This course proceeds from the premise that education is the process of developing human resources. The selection, supervision, evaluation and development of staff is of crucial significance in developing student and educator resources. Hence, how we model each of these personnel processes, has profound implications for educational outcomes. For example, since we believe in educational equity and cultural diversity, this course teaches how these values should be practiced in personnel work.
Recommended Texts:
Waxman, Hersholt and Walberg, Herbert, Effective Teaching: Current Research. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan Pub. 1991.
Recommended Texts (Continued):
Wise, Arthur; Darling-Hammond, Linda; and Berry, Barnett, Effective Teacher Selection: From Recruitment to Retention. 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, Calif. 90406-2138: The Rand Corporation, 1987.
Stankey, Sarah and Popham, W. James (editors), Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1988.
REFERENCES:
Anderson, Mark E., Evaluating Principals: Strategies to Assess and Enhance Their Performance. Eugene, Oregon: Oregon School Study Council, 1989.
Andrews, Richard and Smith, Wilma, Instructional Leadership: How Principals Make a Difference. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1989.
Bailey, Max A. and Sindelar, Nancy W., "Freedom of Speech and the Incompetent/Competent Teacher," in West's Education Law Reporter, July 9, 1987, pp. 1151-1164.
Barth, Roland, Improving Schools From Within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Publishers, 1991.
Bennett, William, Principal Selection Guide. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1987.
Brandt, Ronald, "Progress in Evaluating Teaching," an edition of Educational Leadership, Vol. 44, Num. 7, April 1987.
Bridges, Edwin, Problem Based Learning For Administrators. Eugene, Oregon: ERIC Clearinghouse On Educational Management, 1992.
Bridges, Edwin, The Incompetent Teacher. Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press, 1992.
REFERENCES (Continued):
Centra, John, Determining Faculty Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1979.
Collins, Hugh, Justice in Dismissal: The Law of Termination of Employment. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1992.
Dill, David, What Teachers Need To Know. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990.
Drucker, Peter F., The Effective Executive. New York: HarperCollins, 1967 (particularly chapter 4).
Epstein, Joseph, Masters: Portraits of Great Teachers. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1981.
Fehl, Noah, The Idea of a University in East and West. Hong Kong: Chung Chi College, 1962.
Finkin, Matthew, The Case for Tenure. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Gage, N.L. (Editor), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 1963.
Gage, N.L. (Editor), Mandated Evaluation of Educators: A Conference on California's Stull Act. Stanford, California: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, 1973.
Galambos, Eva, Improving Teacher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1986.
Gall, Meredith and Acheson, Keith, Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers. New York: Longman, 1987.
Goodlad, John, Teachers For Our Nation's Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1990.
Goodlad, John; Soder, Roger; and Sirotnik, Kenneth, The Moral Dimensions of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1990.
Gorton, Richard and Snowden, Petra, School Leadership and Administration (Fourth Edition). Madison, Wisconsin: Brown and Benchmark, 1993.
Hartzell, Gary; Williams, Richard and Nelson, Kathleen, New Voices in the Field. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc., 1995.
Hofstadter, Richard, Academic Freedom in the Age of the College. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.
REFERENCES (Continued):
Hofstadter, Richard and Smith, Wilson (Editors), American Higher Education, A Documentary History (Vol. 1 and 2). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1961.
Houston, W. Robert (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1990.
Kelly, Henry, et.al., Technology And The American Economic Transition: Choices For The Future. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment, 1988.
Leithwood, Kenneth; Begley, Paul and Cousins, J. Bradley, Developing Expert Leadership For Future Schools. London: The Falmer Press, 1992.
Luehe, F. William and Ehrgott, Richard, Clinical Teaching: Clinical Supervision. Visalia, Calif.: Key Publications, 1976 revised edition.
Macrorie, Ken, Twenty Teachers. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.
McDonough, Matthew and Wolf, W. C., "Testing Teachers: Legal and Psychometric Considerations," in Educational Policy, Vol. 1, Number 2, 1987, pp. 199-213.
Melnick, Susan and Pullin, Diana, "Testing Teachers' Professional Knowledge: Legal and Educational Policy Implications," in Educational Policy, Vol. 1, Number 2, 1987, pp. 215-228.
Metzger, Walter P., Academic Freedom In The Age of the University. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.
Patterson, David, When Learned Men Murder. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1996.
Pechman, Ellen, The Condition of Being An Educator. Raleigh, North Carolina: Public School Forum of North Carolina, 1987.
Peters, Tom, Liberation Management. New York: Knopf, 1992.
Pinker, Steven, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking, 2002.
Prasad, Raj, A Digest of Selected California Laws Related to Certificated Personnel. Burlingame, California: Association of California School Administrators, 1986.
Prasad, Raj, A Digest of Selected California Laws Related to Classified Personnel. Burlingame, California: Association of California School Administrators, 1986.
REFERENCES (Continued):
Reynolds, Maynard (Ed.), The Knowledge Base For The Beginning Teacher. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989.
Schon, Donald, Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1987.
Sergiovanni, Thomas, Moral Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
Sharp, William, Collective Bargaining in the Public Schools. Madison, Wisconsin: Brown and Benchmark, 1993.
Stronge, James and Helm, Virginia, Evaluating Professional Support Personnel in Education. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, 1991.
Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War. New York: Viking Penguin Inc., 1986 edition.
Tracy, Saundra and MacNaughton, Robert, Assisting and Assessing Educational Personnel. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1993.
Travers, Robert (Editor), Handbook of Research on Teaching (Second Edition). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company, 1973.
Waxman, Hersholt and Walberg, Herbert, Effective Teaching: Current Research. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan Pub., 1991.
Wildman, Louis, "A Teacher Evaluation Procedure Which Encourages Teacher Professionalism and Protects Student and Public Accountability," in Teaching As A Profession: Issues and Trends in Assessment, The State of California Association of Teacher Educators, May 1989.
Wildman, Louis, "The Creation and Maintenance of Community," in Ebben, James, Institutional Vitality. Adrian, Michigan: Siena Heights College, 1981.
Wittrock, Merlin (Editor), Handbook of Research on Teaching (Third Edition). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1986.
Young, Lauren, et.al., Tomorrow's Schools. East Lansing, Michigan: The Holmes Group, 1990.
Zumwalt, Karen (Editor), Improving Teaching (the 1986 ASCD Yearbook). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1986.
. . . the more we know about our fellow workers, the better team we can be . . .
TOPIC OUTLINE:
What is the "Management and Development of Human Resources?"
Credentialing and Assignment
Selection Procedures and Patterns
Administrator Ethics
Developing Learning Communities
Research on Teaching
Classroom Observations
Teacher Planning
Teacher Knowledge of Subject Matter
Recognizing Great Teachers
Teacher Evaluation Procedures
Labor Relations
Counselor Evaluation
Principal Evaluation
Classified Staff Evaluation
Staff Development
Self-renewal and Development
PROFESSIONAL WRITING STANDARDS REQUIRED:
This graduate course is part of a larger effort to improve the practices of educational administrators. As instructional leaders, students in this course are expected to model an understanding of the liberal arts, which includes, but is certainly much more than applying correct spelling and grammar in written assignments.
Grading Standards for Writing Assignments
|
Category |
Thesis |
Organization |
Development |
Mechanics |
|
Excellent Addresses the assignment thoughtfully and analytically, setting a challenging task. |
___ Displays awareness of audience.
____ Displays sense of purpose in communicating to an audience.
___ Establishes a clearly focused controlling idea.
|
___ Demonstrates coherent and rhetorically sophisticated organization
____ makes effective connections between ideas. |
___ Provides clear generalizations with specific detail, compelling support and cogent analysis.
____ Cites relevant sources and evaluates their validity, effectively integrating them into text when appropriate. |
___ Displays superior, consistent control of syntax, sentence variety, word choice, and conventions of standard English. |
|
Strong Addresses the assignment clearly and analytically, setting a meaningful task. |
___ Addresses audience needs and expectations.
____ Establishes a clearly focused controlling idea. |
___ Demonstrates clear and coherent organization.
|
___ Provides clear generalizations and effective support and analysis.
____ Cites relevant sources, effectively integrating them into text when appropriate. |
___ Displays consistent control of syntax, sentence variety, word choice, and conventions of Standard English. |
|
Adequate Addresses the assignment with some analysis. |
___ Addresses most audience needs and expectations.
____ Establishes a controlling idea. |
___ Demonstrates adequate organization. |
___ Provides support for and some analysis of generalizations.
____ Cites appropriate sources, adequately integrating them into text. |
___ Displays adequate control of syntax, sentence variety, word choice, and conventions of Standard English.
____ Errors do not slow the reader, impede understanding, or seriously undermine the authority of the writer. |
|
Seriously Flawed Addresses the assignment inadequately. |
___ Shows insufficient audience awareness.
____ Strays from the controlling idea or the idea is unclear. |
___ Displays formulaic, random or confusing organization.
|
___ Lacks generalizations, or provides generalizations with inadequate support or analysis.
____ Fails to cite sources or cites and/or integrates them inappropriately. |
___ Shows deficient control of syntax, word choice, and conventions of Standard English
____ Errors impede understanding. |
|
Fundamentally Deficient Fails to address the assignment. |
__ Demonstrates a lack of audience awareness.
____ Lacks a controlling idea. |
___ Lacks organization or organizes illogically. |
___ Displays inability to generalize, analyze or support ideas.
____ Fails to use outside sources or misuses the texts of others. |
___ Shows inadequate control of syntax, word choice, and conventions of Standard English. |
CLASS ACTIVITIES AND REQUIREMENTS:
This seminar uses a variety of educational tools and techniques to link theory and practice. These include role-playing, simulation, small group interaction, lectures, discussion and presentation. Throughout the course, participants are expected to take active roles in discussion and debate, lead parts of the seminar and exchange ideas and information.
METHOD OF EVALUATION:
Students will be evaluated on the following:
The wisdom, pertinence, clarity, and perceptiveness of class Commentary: 30%
Written project and exercises: 40%
Final Examination: 30%
ASSIGNED EXERCISES:
A. Written Project (Complete by the ninth class session)
Personnel projection: (Write a paper on one of the following)
1. Develop a planning model to project long and short range staff plans for a school district of 3,000 or more students.
2. Examine the goals and long range planning documents for a school district of 3,000 or more students, and develop a plan of priorities for recruitment and hiring. Your paper should show how to integrate staff planning with future planning for the entire organization.
3. Develop a staff information system to meet the needs of the management team. (What personnel questions will they ask? What personnel information will the system need to provide?
4. Utilize Lotus 1-2-3 (or similar spreadsheet program) to describe a small school's personnel costs for use in collective bargaining.
5. You have been hired as a school board consultant to analyze the efficiency and effectiveness of a school district's current staff. How would you carry out this task?
6. Describe three scenarios for the future of your school district, and project what impact those organizational changes will have upon staffing.
7. Develop a picture of current manpower problems for consideration by the Management Team. What are the district's current staff planning assumptions? What future organizational structure does the district anticipate? What information should be contained in a personnel inventory?
8. Develop a Human Resource Development and Utilization plan for your school or school district. Assume that by the year 2010, schools will become learning community centers, as described in my paper, "Creating Learning Communities." As personnel director, how will you utilize your present staff, and what staff will you attempt to recruit? In developing this paper you will need to review the academic interests of your present faculty and administration, as well as review community development plans, available through various government planning offices and private developers.
9. Develop a successful introduction (not induction) program for new employees.
a. Develop a list of content knowledge which you wish to transmit.
b. Develop a set of procedures for the introduction program implementation.
c. How are you going to evaluate the effectiveness of the program?
d. Who will have administrative responsibility?
10. Write summary-type answers to each of the following (a-e) questions, and summarize one specific research study in each area (a-e). Then identify one nationally recognized great teacher; indicate how he or she was recognized as a "great teacher"; and indicate the extent to which he or she "fit" what you have said about items a-e.
a. What can teachers do that will have a demonstrable impact upon student learning? (process-product research) (p. 33-62)
b. What does the teacher effectiveness research say? What are its limitations? (p. 66-78)
c. What do we know about classroom processes? (p. 145-157)
d. What do we know about teacher planning? (p. 183-198)
e. How is teacher knowledge of subject matter related to teaching? (p. 203-213)
f. How does one recognize great teachers? Who were some of the great teachers and what did they do that was so great? To what extent can we learn from them? (p. 217-235)
In summarizing the research studies, describe the experimental design, the statistical analyses employed, the findings, and the generalizations which follow for practice.
11. According to Stanford Professor Henry Levin,
Virtually all of the studies that have measured teacher verbal aptitudes have found that variable to be significantly related to student achievement. Indeed, the consistency of this finding is buttressed by the fact that separate studies have been carried out at several grade levels and for samples of black, white, and Mexican-American students. (Levin, Henry, "Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production," in Froomkin, Joseph; Jamison, Dean; and Radner, Jamison (Eds.), Education As An Industry. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1976, pp. 152-153.)
Summarize and critique several such studies.
12. Teacher Selection Project (adapted from Bridges, Edwin, Problem Based Learning) (Note: This could easily be adapted to become a Principal Selection Project.)
The context for creating and maintaining a quality teaching force is taking shape. Most districts will be hiring, rather than laying off, teachers. The supply is not expected to meet the demand, especially in the areas of math, science, and special education. If the pattern of the 60s, the period of the last teacher shortage, repeats itself, nearly half of the newly hired teachers will leave their districts within three years and the teaching profession within seven years. Moreover, the most talented are more likely to leave than the least talented. Those who stay are unlikely to lose their jobs for either marginal or poor performance.
If this is the context, how might administrators seek to create and maintain a quality teaching force? The answer to this important question is multifaceted. Administrators need to mount a comprehensive approach to the problem, one that addresses recruitment, selection, treatment of new hires, and granting tenure. Although this project emphasizes only one aspect of this approach, namely, selection, it is important for the prospective principal to consider these other issues as well.
The effectiveness of any selection process depends in part on the quality of the applicant pool. Hiring mistakes are much more likely when there is a high selection ratio (that is, the organization is forced to hire a relatively high proportion of the applicants). To increase the size and quality of the applicant pool, administrators should treat recruitment as a marketing problem. Marketing specialists identify the consumers' needs (in this instance, the applicant is a potential consumer) and then proceed to show how the product or service (in this instance, the district represents the product or service) will satisfy the consumers' needs. The marketing specialist also realizes that consumers will continue to buy the product or to use the service only if the product or service delivers on its promises.
Once the applicant is hired, the organization needs to create the conditions under which successful performance is likely. The quality of the teacher's performance is affected by several factors. The most obvious determinants are the teacher's competence and motivation. Less obvious, but no less important, are the level of difficulty of the teacher's assignment, the level and type of support that the teacher receives, and the resources that the organization provides the teacher to carry out his/her role.
Unfortunately, most new hires do not teach under conditions that are conducive to success. Compared with the veterans on the staff, the newcomer often has more of everything--more preps, more rooms in which to teach, more students who are viewed as difficult to teach, and more extra-class responsibilities. Newcomers also have relatively fewer organizational resources to meet these demands. Veterans have accumulated instructional materials, supplies, and equipment over the years. They also have inherited resources from colleagues who have retired or moved on to other occupations. To maximize the possibility that newcomers will be effective and find their role satisfying, principals should strive to create more favorable working conditions for new hires. If newcomers are to succeed and to experience job satisfaction, they should receive an assignment with a reasonable level of difficulty, sufficient resources to meet the organization's demands, and ample substantive and social-emotional support. It is the principal's responsibility to create these conditions.
Even if the conditions are conducive to effective performance, the teacher may fail to meet the district's standards of performance. Hiring mistakes are inevitable because there are no fool-proof selection procedures or tools. The probationary period offers the principal an opportunity to identify these hiring mistakes and to verify whether the new comer is a fully competent teacher who deserves tenure. It is virtually impossible for a district to create and maintain a quality teaching force unless these tenure decisions are sound ones.
Few principals relish the thought of having to making a negative tenure decision; they prefer to hire teachers who have the right stuff. Principals are in a much better position to improve their ratio of hits to misses if they are familiar with what research has to say about the reliability and validity of the various selection tools. They also are more likely to make a sound hiring decision if they can overcome the basic human tendency to focus on individual behavior and to ignore the context in which this behavior was observed. . . .
In designing the selection process principals need to realize that they are attempting to predict how an applicant will behave in a particular context. The accuracy of this prediction is likely to be greater if two conditions are met. First, the selection process is structured to elicit the kinds of behavior that one is trying to predict. Second, the context in which the behavior is being observed resembles the context in which the person will subsequently perform. As you read about the soundness of various selection tools and contemplate how you will design your own teacher selection process, bear these two conditions in mind.
Principals also need to realize that the selection process entails a choice by the applicant, as well as the organization. Individuals who are treated poorly during the recruitment and selection phase are apt to decline an offer of employment. To reduce the incidence of backouts, principals should structure the recruitment and selection process in a way that reflects a concern for the individual (for example, prompt and nonbureaucratic responses to inquiries, reasonable speed in making decisions, and timely information about what has happened or is happening with the individual's application). Moreover, the offer of employment should be personalized and exhibit a willingness to assist the individual in making the transition to the school and the community.
Learning Objectives
This project has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to learn about the following issues:
1. selection tools and what research has to say about each of these tools
2. the design and implementation of protocols for using the various selection tools
3. the legal aspects of teacher selection
Guiding Questions
1. What is the information that you will be seeking? Why have you chosen to gather this information? How will you be gathering it?
2. Is it reasonable to expect the selection tool to yield this information?
3. Which selection tools seem to be the most defensible in light of research? least defensible?
4. What are some of the purposes, other than choosing the person with the right stuff, for which the interview and the work sample might be used?
5. What are the legal aspects of selection that may enter into this project?
6. What does the principal need to know about the legal aspects of misassignment in California?
Problem
Assume that the Mountain View School District is looking for an English teacher and that you have been appointed to the Selection Committee. One individual will serve as the chair of the selection committee. The tasks of the selection committee are as follows:
* Create a position announcement and a formal job description explaining the teacher evaluation system and criteria for teaching effectiveness used in the school district.
* Create an application blank that you will use for this position. This application blank should be legally defensible and should solicit information that you will use in evaluating the suitability of applicants for the position. Attach to the application blank your rationale for the information that you are requesting.
* Design the interview and work sample that you will use.
District policy requires that selection committees use two methods--a portfolio and an interview. Spell out the details of the procedures your committee will follow when implementing each method and explain why you intend to use these procedures. Be sure that your procedures are legally defensible.
* Implement your procedures
Use the interview and portfolio requirement that you have designed to choose the person whom you will recommend for the position. I will attempt to find three individuals to volunteer to participate in the selection process as "applicants." I will supply the names and phone numbers of these individuals; you will need to make all the necessary arrangements.
* Notify each "applicant" of the outcome.
As a condition of participating in this simulation, each volunteer wants to know whether (s)he was selected and what suggestions your committee might have for helping the person to improve.
Product Specifications
Your selection committee is expected to provide a report (not to exceed one page, single spaced) to the Director of Personnel. This report should contain the following:
1. the recommendation of your committee
2. an overview of the selection process that you used
3. a justification for your recommendation
4. what should be done to ensure the candidate's success once hired
Attach to this report a copy of the application blank (including the rationale behind it) you created, the questions you asked during the interview, the portfolio, and any other materials your committee may have created during the selection process.
You will also be expected to provide each volunteer with the following information: (a) the outcome (Is the person being recommended for the position?) and (b) feedback regarding perceived strengths and areas in need of improvement. This information may be communicated face-to-face or in writing. (If you put the information in writing, provide me with a copy.)
Assessment
When you have finished, please prepare an integrative essay (not to exceed one typewritten, single-spaced page) that reflects what you have learned while completing this project. Also, answer the following questions:
1. How did you feel about the project when you first read about what it involved?
2. Now that you have completed the project, what are your feelings about it?
3. What effect, if any, is this project likely to have on your behavior in the future?
4. What recommendations would you make for improving this project?
13. One aspect of the "management and development of human resources" involves responding appropriately to the leadership of others. How should principals respond to teacher leadership?
14. The Administrating "Year-round" Schools Project.
Over the past few years, more than a few schools have adopted year-round schedules. Informal conversations with a few of the administrators of these schools suggested that these administrators seem "troubled" by the fact that for portions of the year, though they are on vacation, their school is still operating. The administrators that came to our attention seemed emotionally exhausted. Hence this personnel research: to determine the effects of year-round schooling on administrators.
Initially it would seem that there are a number of components to this study:
A. Background: the history of the school year. How did we get the traditional academic calendar, and what other calendars have been tried?
B. Student impact on academic learning: Do more days result in more student learning? Do 180 school days, arranged with more frequent, but shorter breaks, result in improved student achievement? How serious is the retention loss for students over the traditional summer break? Has any of this been studied with a modicum of scientific objectivity?
C. Student impact on developmental learning: What summer opportunities exist for students? What information should be provided to parents so that they might design appropriate summer opportunities for their children?
D. For what reasons have year-round schools adopted year-round calendars? What variations of year-round calendars are being utilized?
E. Facility utilization: What facility utilization studies of year-round schedules have been conducted? What have they concluded?
F. Financial implications: What are the financial consequences of year-round schedules? What pertinent financial studies have been conducted and what have they demonstrated?
G. Attitudes of administrators: How do administrators feel about year-round schedules?
H. Mental health aspects: What have been the emotional and physical consequences of year-round schools on administrators? What effect has year-round education had on administrator absenteeism?
B. Written Exercises (As further explained and assigned in class)
DAILY OUTLINE:
Session #1: Human Resources
Introduction of Participants
Pre-Course Assessment
What is the "Management and Development of Human Resources?"
Comparing Alternative Developmental Models
Background Papers:
"What Model of Instructional Leadership?"
"Creating Learning Communities"
Discussion: "Here I Was A New Teacher"
What errors were made by the administration?
How do you make new staff members feel welcome?
How do you make staff members feel appreciated?
What are some of the "warm, fuzzy" practices that we can share which will prevent what happened to this new teacher?
Reading: Begin reading the above mentioned portions of Effective Teaching: Current Research.
Session #2. Credentialing and Assignment
Senate Bill 435
The Administrator's Assignment Manual
Teacher Assignment Practices in California School Districts: A Report to the California State Legislature (These documents review the credentialing and assignment laws you must apply as a practicing school administrator in the State of California.)
Videotape and Discussion on Credentialing and Assignment
Test on Credentialing and Assignment Practices
Administrative Credentialing: Preparation of an Assessment Procedure
Reading: Continue reading Effective Teaching: Current Research.
Session #3: Selection Procedures and Patterns
Assessment Centers (What are they? What does the research say?)
The Principal Perceiver Instrument (An example of a marketed selection instrument with an analysis of related research.)
Career Patterns and Career Order
Affirmative Action (What are we trying to accomplish as a nation by eliminating racial, sexual and religious discrimination?)
Sex Discrimination
Administrator Ethics
Reading: Complete reading of Effective Teaching: Current Research, and prepare to share specific research summaries with seminar members.
Session #4: Research Update On Teaching
What do we know about teaching?
Session #5 and #6: Research On Teaching
Presentation of specific research summaries by seminar members.
Reading for Session 7:
Robert Slavin, "The PET and the Pendulum: Faddism in Education and How To Stop It," Phi Delta Kappan, June 1989, pp. 752-758. (Certain teaching techniques and evaluation procedures have become supported by those trained in those techniques with almost a "cult-like" fanaticism. To examine other teacher evaluation procedures it has become necessary to first show that those procedures do not have overwhelming research support.)
Session #7: A Review of Teacher Evaluation Procedures (Some say that a teacher should be evaluated simply in terms of the results. The "professional standards" model implies that a teacher should be evaluated in terms of whether or not the teacher uses specific prescriptive practices recognized as appropriate. The "reflective model" recognizes that there are many constructive ways of responding to situations, but then complicates the teacher evaluation process.)
Sources of Error in Observation
Alternative Teacher Evaluation Prescriptions
Discussion of Classroom Narratives
Additional topics, if time permits, on Teacher/Administrator Relations:
Staff Supervision Case Study: Teacher Burnout
Post-Observation Case Study
The Principal's Role in the Event of a Strike
Session #8: Counselor and Principal Evaluation Procedures
Counselor Evaluation
Principal Evaluation Strategies
Valentine's Approach
Manatt's Performance Evaluation Cycle
Georgia's "Leadership Performance Assessment Instrument"
Kansas Principal Evaluation Model
Cal State-Hayward's Self-Evaluation Leadership Profile
Leithwood's Principal Effectiveness Taxonomy
Andrews' Instructional Leadership Criteria
Tigard's Principal Evaluation Program
Summary Comments
Analysis of a Local Procedure
Session #9: Classified Staff Evaluation
Session #10: Staff Development
Institute for Quality in Human Life Seminars
Final Examination
25 Ideas and Concepts
1. The concept of "Management and Development of Human Resources" as a fundamental educational idea.
2. The need to integrate planning and selection processes.
3. Credentialing and Assignment Laws.
4. Alternative Approaches to the Selection of Educators, along with an examination of the political and educational implications of those alternative approaches.
5. Typical career patterns
6. Sensitivity to the Conditions of Teaching and the Problems of Educator Applicants.
7. Racial and Sexual Discrimination.
8. Administrator Ethics.
9. The concept of reflective practice.
10. The concept of a learning community.
11. The concept of a school as a bridge between mainstream and local culture.
12. The Concept Of Student Engagement
13. Process-Product Research On Teaching
14. Teacher Effectiveness Research
15. Research on Classroom Processes
16. Research on Teacher Planning
17. The Diversity of "Great" Teaching
18. Alternative Teacher Evaluation Procedures.
19. Sources of Error in Teacher Observation.
20. The Evaluation of Counselors.
21. Alternative approaches to Principal Evaluation.
22. Team Planning for Staff Development.
23. Treating Teacher Burnout.
24. A Strategy for Self-renewal and Personal Development
25. Criteria for Assessing Personal Professional Development
"I think the thing I've learned from this course is that a principal needs to learn as much as she can about teachers. You need to know your staff thoroughly, listen and show people you truly care about them. When they realize you are ready to help them realize their goals, you will find a positive and favorable response." --a principal
"...we invoke each others' potential by our willingness to see the essence of each other." -- Peter Senge (in Senge, Peter et al., The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., 1994, p. 4)
Personnel Projections
1. The base to any school district planning is the curriculum to be offered. All planners including the Personnel Administrator must have this information. Components of the curriculum program of the future must show:
a. class size
b. organization of instruction
c. facility needs
2. Staff planning breaks down into areas such as specialists, staffing ratios, paraprofessional ratios, administration, and necessary number of classified staff as determined by job/completion ratios. Other key variables include union contracts, community demands, and standards of service.
3. Staff deployment is the manner in which present and projected staff are assigned in the district.
a. Decisions regarding the use of specialists need to be made.
b. Differentiated staff versus other models should be debated.
c. Schedules and work load are also variables to be discussed.
4. Utilizing the above assumptions, the necessary number of human resources can be projected through considering:
a. enrollments
b. personnel ratios
c. staff requirements
d. recruitment requirements and turnover rates
5. Once the future staffing needs of the organization are projected, an inventory of current human resources in the organization should be made. This staffing inventory can be made by attendance areas, schools, departments, etc. The data collected on each staff member might be some of the following:
a. employment dates
b. training, both academic and non-academic
c. certification
d. experience in assignments both in and out of the district
e. age and possible retirement date
f. district satisfaction with employee based upon evaluations
g. qualifications for present position
6. Once the staffing inventory is complete, short and long range manpower plans can be developed.
Knowledge Base
Personnel (certification, recruitment, selection, assignment, compensation, collective bargaining processes, formative and summative teacher evaluation, teacher rights, counselor evaluation, administrator evaluation, classified employee evaluation, staff development)
A. Certification issues
Credential and assignment laws
B. Affirmative action
C. Writing position descriptions
D. Selection procedures
E. Induction strategies
F. Salary/benefit packages
G. The conditions of teaching
H. Contractual variables
I. Summative teacher evaluation
J. Counselor evaluation strategies
K. Administrator evaluation strategies
L. Classified employee evaluation
N. Treating educator burnout
ACCOMMODATIONS FOR DISABILITIES
Bakersfield, Santa Clarita, or Hanford Participants—To request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office of Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) as soon as possible. Their office is located in SA 140, and they may be reached at 661-654-3360 (voice), or 661-654-6288 (TDD). If you have an accommodations letter from the SSD Office documenting that you have a disability, please present the letter to me during my office hours as soon as possible so we can discuss the specific accommodations that you might need in this class.
Antelope Valley Participants—To request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office of Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) as soon as possible. Their office is located in Bldg. 200, and they may be reached at 661-952-5061 (voice) or 661-952-5120 (tdd). If you have an accommodation letter from the SSD Office documenting that you have a disability, please present the letter to me during my office hours so we can discuss the specific accommodations that you might need in this class.
Rights and Responsibilities of Students
Academic Integrity
The principles of truth and integrity are recognized as fundamental to a community of teachers and scholars. The University expects that both faculty and students will honor these principles and in so doing will protect the integrity of all academic work and student grades. Students are expected to do all work assigned to them without unauthorized assistance and without giving unauthorized assistance. Faculty have the responsibility of exercising care in the planning and supervision of academic work so that honest effort will be encouraged and positively reinforced.
There are certain forms of conduct that violate the university's policy of academic integrity. ACADEMIC DISHONESTY (CHEATING) is a broad category of actions that involve fraud and deception to improve a grade or obtain course credit. Academic dishonesty (cheating) is not limited to examination situations alone, but arises whenever students attempt to gain an unearned academic advantage. PLAGIARISM is a specific form of academic dishonesty (cheating) which consists of the misuse of published or unpublished works of another by claiming them as one's own. Plagiarism may consist of handing in someone else's work as one's own, copying or purchasing a pre-written composition and claiming it as one's own, using paragraphs, sentences, phrases, words or ideas written by another without giving appropriate citation, or using data and/or statistics compiled by another without giving appropriate citation. Another example of academic dishonesty (cheating) is the SUBMISSION OF THE SAME, OR ESSENTIALLY THE SAME, PAPER or other assignment for credit in two different courses without receiving prior approval from the instructors of the affected courses.
When a faculty member discovers a violation of the university's policy of academic integrity, the faculty member is required to notify the CSUB Dean of Student Life and CSUB Student Conduct Coordinator and the student(s) involved. A course grade of 'F' may be assigned or another grade penalty may be applied at the discretion of the courses instructor. Additional academic sanctions are determined by the student conduct coordinator. Academic sanctions may include disciplinary probation, suspension, permanent expulsion from the university or from the California State University system, administrative hold on the release of records, and withholding a degree. Disciplinary probation shall be noted on the student's formal academic record only for the duration of the probationary period. Disciplinary suspension and expulsion are a part of the student's permanent record.
The student may pursue a formal hearing or make a settlement agreement with the student conduct coordinator. CSUB Dean of Student Life and CSUB Student Conduct Coordinator shall conduct an investigation, confer with the faculty member, students and any witnesses identified, and review all evidence. The student is entitled to a formal hearing scheduled by the CSUB Dean of Student Life and CSUB Student Conduct Coordinator, in which the evidence of the alleged violation shall be presented before an impartial Hearing Officer (appointed by the President) and the student shall be present to provide an explanation or defense. The Hearing Officer shall submit a written report to the President containing the findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Alternatively, a settlement agreement may be made with the CSUB Dean of Student Life and CSUB Student Conduct Coordinator. The settlement agreement will specify the academic sanctions, the length and terms of disciplinary probation or suspension, and the conditions the student is expected to meet in order to remain in good standing (e.g., training or regular meetings with the CSUB Dean of Student Life and CSUB Student Conduct Coordinator). All sanctions are reported to the instructor reporting the incident, the student's Chair, and the student's Dean.
Any repeated violation of academic integrity shall result in more serious academic sanctions. Normally, this will include suspension or expulsion from the university with a note on the student's permanent record.
Academic Freedom
Freedom to pursue truth and to achieve personal and intellectual development is essential to CSUB's community of scholars. The University is firmly committed to such freedom for both students and faculty. Academic freedom is the University's guarantee of freedom of expression by all students and faculty under the First Amendment.
For the achievement of academic freedom, a necessary condition for such pursuit is an acceptance of the spirit of inquiry and appreciation for diverse ideas, viewpoints, cultures, and life-styles. Acceptance must be demonstrated not only in the classroom but in all other areas of the campus. The achievement of academic freedom, however, must occur within a respect for law and the protection of the opinions and dignity of others.
Civility and Respectful Conduct
The classroom is essential for the achievement of academic freedom, the pursuit of truth, and the development of students. Because of its importance, students are expected to exhibit respect for the views of others, the professionalism of the instructor, and the goals of academic freedom whenever they are in the classroom.
Faculty are obligated to recognize and respect student diversity, ideas, perceptions, and opinions. At the same time, faculty have a fundamental responsibility to maintain the integrity of the learning environment. When confronted by unreasonable disruption in the classroom, faculty are expected to initiate actions to correct such conditions. Such actions may result in disciplinary action ranging from removal from the classroom to formal disciplinary sanctions, including probation, suspension, or expulsion.