Final Study Guide
Sociology 120: Critical Thinking
Winter 2008  (Last Edit 1/21/08  6:45pm ADA)

 The latest version of this Syllabus will be maintained on the web at: 
http://www.csubak.edu/~jross/classes/soc120/SOC120.HTML

Contents

  • Instructional Staff
  • Current Quarter Times and Places
  • Course Description
  • Text/Readings
  • Assignments
  • Class Rules and Expectations
  • Grading and Midterm Distributions
  • Class Schedule
  • Web Links
  • News and Web Links  for Critical Thinkers
  • Final Study Guide (Available week 10)


  • Debate/Topic/Issue Links for Winter 08

    Back to:
     
    CSUB Home page
    CSUB Library
    CSUB Sociology & Anthropology
    Jim Ross


    Instructional Staff
    Instructor: Jim Ross, office CC203 (654-2384).
    Email jross@csubak.edu (Please use RunnerMail for all messages to instructor).)
    Web Page: http://www.csub.edu/~jross

    Office Hours (Will start week 2 of quarter)
    Immediately following class as well as times listed in Office Hours.  To guarantee your time, sign up on my office door one day in advance.
    [I have hours posted. Hours may change due to scheduling.  I may go to the lab or cafeteria during these office hours.  Check my door and web schedule for specifics.]

    Assistant: Ryan Brown,  office CC203 (654-2384).
    Email  rbrown22@runner.csub.edu
    Web Page: http://stuweb.csub.edu/~rbrown22

    Office Hours (Will start week 2 of quarter)
    times and place will be listed on assistant's web page Office Hours

    Return to Table of Contents 


    Fall 2007 Quarter Times and Places

    TIMES AND PLACES:
    SOC120 CRN 13042,  Section 1 Block A
            8:00am. --9:25 am  M, W, F  (First Class January 3, 2008, Last class March 10, 2008)
            Room: 101E DDH
            Exam:  Wednesday, March 12, from 8-10:30am --No finals will be rescheduled.

    SOC120 CRN 13043,  Section 2 Block B
            8:00am. --10:20 am  T, R  (First Class January 2, 2008 Last class March 11, 2008)
            Break 9:00-9:10  (approximately)
            Room: 101E DDH
            Exam: Thursday March 13, from 8-10:30am --No finals will be rescheduled.
    Return to Table of Contents

    Course Description
    1. Course Description: Critical Thinking and Contemporary Social Problems introduces logical reasoning, information competency and social science methodology as it can be applied to selected contemporary American social problems. Focus is on elements of critical thinking, including deductive and inductive reasoning, proofs, probabilities, the role of values, and the status of evidence. Goals of this course are designed to fulfill requirements for Goal III in the General Education Program, Logical Reasoning Competency. Its purpose is to foster "critical thinking" as it can be applied to selected, but fundamental, contemporary social problems in America.

    2. Course Goals: Each student will apply critical thinking to contemporary social and personal proplems and in the process develop the following:
    (1) Achieve an understanding of the relationship of language to logic.

    (2) Develop the ability to analyze, critique, and advocate ideas.

    (3) Learn to reason inductively and deductively.

    (4) Learn how to reach factual or judgmental conclusions based on sound inferences drawn from unambiguous statements.

    (5) Develop techniques to reach tentative conclusions based on incomplete information.

    (6) Apply logic and critical thinking to selected life problems, contemporary social problems.

    (7) Apply logic and critical thinking to data problems, scientific studies, governmental data, popular studies and opinion polls.

    (8) Develop Information Competency skills including finding and evaluating credibility and usefulness.

    A variety of course activities--text readings, lectures, discussions, films, group exercises, research exercises, quizzes, and exams are utilized to
    contribute to attaining these goals.

    Return to Table of Contents

    Test/Readings
    Moore, B. N. and Parker, R. Critical Thinking 8th Edition Mountain View CA. McGraw Hill Publishing Co (new $87.65). We are using an edition that was used in fall 06 and winter 07 so you may be able to find a previous student with a copy or a used copy at the bookstore ($65.75).  Each student  will definitely need access to their own copy of the text to read, study and use in class exercises.

    The Los Angeles Times, New York Times or Wall Street Journal newspaper, available in the library and at many newsstands (not all) or in most local libraries. Students  can get a free copy of The Los Angeles Times or New York Times at the Union if you go early enough. You could share with a friend. It is expected that you will scan at least one of these papers either Sunday or daily and be aware of current events, values, attitudes, and related issues. This will be used as resource material for debates, class projects, discussions and test examples.

    Class members on the way to or from CSUB should listen to one hour of NPR Morning Edition (5:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.) and/or All things Considered (5:00 p.m. -7:00 p.m. on public radio at 89.2 FM) and when possible see  60 Minutes Sunday 7:00-8:00 on CBS. Also suggested is The Daily Show and The Colbert Report (10:00 and 11:00pm on Comedy Central).

    Additional class materials, library reading assignments and video movies will be made available as needed. Where possible material will be placed on the web server and/or closed reserve at the C.S.U.B. library. Videos will be placed on closed reserve for a period of one week when possible.

    Links:
    Text Web Page (8th Edition)

    This web site includes various study tools for students for the 8th edition. It has objectives, glossary, tutorials, review and additional quizzes. The web site for the text includes outlines, in depth treatments of complex concepts, quizzes, etc.:
    http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/007312625x/student_view0/index.html
    Real-World Reasoning
    Interesting links to information about various topics in Critical Thinking. Following the "thread" of several current issues is of particular interest for our issue topic assignment.
    Logic & Fallacies
    "There's a lot of debate on the net. Unfortunately, much of it is of very low quality. The aim of this document is to explain the basics of logical reasoning, and hopefully improve the overall quality of debate."
    The Power of Logic: Basics, Arguments, Categorical Syllogisms, Venn Diagrams, etc. The Skeptics Society

    "The Skeptics Society is a scientific and educational organization of scholars, scientists, historians, magicians, professors and teachers, and anyone curious about controversial ideas, extraordinary claims, revolutionary ideas and the promotion of science. Our mission is to serve as an educational tool for those seeking clarification and viewpoints on those controversial ideas and claims. "

    The James Randi Educational Foundation Home page
    The home page of the subject of the PBS special The Amazing Randi. Great web site on the debunking of "Miracles".  A few years ago his interest was in the book The Bible Code by Michael Drosnin. For a look at an examination of the claims of Drosnin's book when applied to Moby Dick, War and Peace as well as the newest prediction of Michael Drosnin that Princess Di's death was predicted in the Bible, check   out: Assassinations Foretold in Moby Dick.  A recent focus was the book Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You To Know About and the infomercial by Kevin Trudeau. One continuing topic is his million dollar challange to Sylvia Brown.
    The Skeptics Dictionary Dictionary and examples of critical thinking including; Alternative Medicine, Cryptozoology, ETs & UFOs, Frauds & Hoax, Junk Science, Logic & Perception, Science & Philosophy, Supernatural Paranormal and New Age

    Penn & Teller  "They defy labels, and at times, good taste. They’ve performed together for more than 25 years; skewering the genre of magic, their sold-out audiences, and themselves -- very often all at the same time, within one mind-boggling evening...Their latest project, “Penn & Teller: Bullshit!" is a new series for the Showtime network. The controversial show tackles the frauds and fakes behind such topics as talking to the dead, alien abductions and feng shui."

    Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal  CSICOP encourages the critical investigation of paranormal and fringe-science claims from a responsible, scientific point of view and disseminates factual information about the results of such inquiries to the scientific community and the public. 

    Factcheck.org "...monitor(s) the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews, and news releases. Our goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding."  Interesting insights into the News http://www.cjrdaily.org/   "CJR's mission is to promote better journalism. We do that by helping working journalists to figure out and execute their mission in a difficult and shifting environment. And as a media monitor, CJR is also a resource for all Americans who want the best possible version of their free press."  PS what does "non partisan" mean?

    Information Competence Toolbox.  Check links on this page for help with a wide range of Information competence skills, browsing the internet. evaluating web pages, word processing, etc.

    Every day Critical Thinking (we will, time available look at these and other topics):  [links will not work until after class exercise] Which is best way to travel?,  How do I avoid telemarketers? Am I fit? What is my Credit Score? Which cellphone should I buy?

    Return to Table of Contents

    Assignments--These are all clickable links on the class web site. These will be edited just prior to assigning so check back before completing an assignment.
    A02 sample (available after assignment completion)
    A03 sample (available after assignment completion)
    Group Assignments with Individual Components:
    Return to Table of Contents

    General Rules and Expectations
    (1) Attendance/etc:

    I expect students to attend classes, be on time, be prepared and not disrupt class by leaving in the middle of presentations. I will be on time, prepared, and return papers as promptly as possible. Class exercises, presentations, and discussions will provide primary structure for the course with the text, readings and computer exercises providing supporting information. Each class member is responsible for obtaining missed materials, notes, handouts etc., from others in the class. Absences or tardiness beyond two class periods will result in a two percent deduction on final grade for each late, left early or missed class. If you have more than four absences or tardiness, you have missed a significant amount of material and experiences and should likely drop this class. Choose beach/skiing/sick days carefully! Athletes and other students with special scheduling difficulties must discuss these with the instructor 2 weeks prior to the difficulty to be considered for special arrangements. There will be no rescheduling of the final exam.

    (2) Communication:

    We will use the C.S.U.B. wb site and CSUB Rummer Mail for communication and distribution of class materials. Each student may access their Runner Mail accounts accounts in the main computer lab in the basement of the library or on any computer connected to the internet. Students will have to check their e-mail and if necessary copy materials from the web. Assignments must be turned in at the assigned class. Assignments cannot be submitted by email. You must use Runner Mail  for all communication in our class because the RunnerMail system is set up for distribution lists and controlled by CSUB. Be advised, due to a huge amount of junk email I do not always read email from non RunnerMailsources.

     http://runner.csub.edu/
    (3) Drops:

    The catalog regulations for dropping classes will be followed. Drops only for "serious and compelling reasons" after the 6th week of class.

    (4) Plagiarism:

    Plagiarism, copying or imitating the language, ideas and/or thoughts of another author and passing them off as one's original work.

    Fraud, deceit, trickery, sharp practice or breach of confidence by which it is sought to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.

    (American College Dictionary, Random House, 1964)

    Plagiarism is an extremely serious offense. Using published or unpublished material without citing the source is plagiarism. You may use someone else's material if you appropriately enclose it in quotation marks and precisely reference its source. Such material, however, should be used sparingly, if at all. Simply paraphrasing someone else's material by minimal rearrangement of the wording is also plagiarism. It is an equally serious offense if you write a paper for someone else, or copy someone else's work, or allow someone to copy your work. Using material from a paper you previously wrote for another purpose other then this specific class is also plagiarism.  Turning in a paper, created by a group, as a personal effort is cheating.  Making up data instead of performing appropriate research data collection procedures is considered a serious violation of scientific and academic honesty. In all cases, these acts are cheating. Students who commit any of these offenses will (1) receive a failing grade in the course, and (2) will receive a letter of reprimand from the professor, a copy of which will be placed in their files. A repeated instance of academic fraud will result in a petition to have the student permanently expelled from the university.  The CSUB catalog contains a statement on cheating/plagerism/ and the AcademicIntegrityViolation process.

    Students who may be unsure as to whether or not their writing or other work may constitute academic fraud (cheating or plagiarism) should seek the advice of their instructor prior to formal submission or presentation. Plagiarism and academic fraud are serious offenses, but they are easily avoided with a modicum of care and forethought. For more specifics on plagiarism I expect everyone to read this source:

    http://www.csub.edu/ssricrem/Howto/plagiarism.htm
    Return to Table of Contents

    Grading: Grading will be based on the following with 100 possible points:
    (1) Participation (60 participation points)
    (a) Class members will write 5 short papers to develop and demonstrate their Critical Thinking skills. Each paper will have specific guidelines that will be available on the class home page site to class members prior to their write-up. The first assignment (A01) guidelines are now available on the class web site.

    Each assignment is worth 3 participation points. I will subtract 1-3 participation  points for each paper not satisfactorily completed.

    Papers must be typed, handwritten papers will not be accepted.

    (b) Attendance and components of the Class Project will also be included in participation points, see below

    (2) Testing (40 grading points)

    Quizzes: Quizzes will be given frequently. They are given to verify study efforts and to determine comprehension and understanding of chapter concepts and class material. Most will occur at the end of discussion of each chapter but some quizzes will be given prior to discussion of the chapter to test reading comprehension and to motivate study.

    Midterm: A midterm will be given the 5th or 6th week of the quarter. The midterm will be composed of a selection of questions from multiple choice, fill in the blank, matching, short answer and discussion questions.

    Final: A comprehensive final will be given during exam week as per schedule. It will be composed of a selection from multiple choice, fill in the blank, matching, short answer and discussion

    (3) Class Project (9 participation and 10 grading points)

    Skills in critical thinking will be exercised in developing knowledge of several current social issues. Issues from previous years are listed at the top of this syllabus. Class members will individually and in groups collect news articles and develop knowledge of the various facets of the class chosen social issues. Each group will create and distribute a statement defining and explaining their  issue. Points will be awarded for the collection of news articles and the identification of  issues, sides of an issue and claims on the issue treated in each article.  Extra credit will be given to individuals collecting the most articles on the issues. One assignment will list and evaluate 8 claims (4 pro and 4 con) on a worksheet, identifying appropriate critical thinking aspects of the claims, and deciding usefulness of the clams in a debate. Group points will be based on a groups pro and con draft evaluation of claims for the debate. The final polished paper, one per group, containing an Introduction, Arguments, Rebuttals and Conclusion will be evaluated with each member assigned the group grade. Oral debates evaluated by class members and myself will be the final component of the class project. A comprehensive description of the components of the class project is available on the web at Class Project.

    (4) Grade Points Distribution

    There are two components for determination of grades; participation (approximately 60 points) and evaluation (approximately 40 points).  Participation includes but is not limited to homework, class attendance, group work. It includes all components directed toward learning.  Grading/evaluation includes those tasks directed to evaluation of student knowledge and skills and includes quizzes, midterm, debate and final.  In general participation requires effort and time on assignments and seeking and giving help to other class members  while grading is a comparative evaluation of knowledge and skills.

    (NOTE: No quiz or midterm make ups will be given: class quiz average will substitute for missed quizzes. Missed quizzes, exceeding excused absences, will be counted as 0. The final grade will replace an excused, missed midterm.

    Participation Points 60 points
    Papers-homework     25pts--Short typed papers--see participation points
    Class Project       15pts--See Class Project above
    Attendance          20pts--See Attendance/etc:, above
    Grading/evaluation 40 points *These determine your basic grade*. All individual tests, midterm, quizzes and final exam, (grading/evaluation points), are curved 15% - A, 35% - B, 35% - C, 15% - D.
    Midterm             30% of 40pts- Given 5th or 6th week of quarter
    Quizzes             30% of 40pts- of 40 pts- Given on each chapter
    Debate 10% of 40pts- of 40 pts- Given last class meetings of quarter
    Exam          30% of 40pts- of 40 pts- Given as scheduled
    Participation points lost on homework and projects, missed classes (exceeding two), etc. will be subtracted from the grading/evaluation  points before grade is assigned by the scale listed below.
    Scale for class grade
    97-100   A+      93-96   A       90-93   A-
    87-89    B+      83-86   B       80-83   B-
    77-79    C+      73-77   C       70-73   C-
    67-69    D+      63-67   D       60-63   D-
    below 60 F
    Return to Table of Contents

    Back to:


    CSUB Home page
    CSUB Library
    CSUB Sociology & Anthropology
    Jim Ross