The Kawaiisu
Tribe
welcomes you to our official Home Page. Feel free to visit us often and share
our ancient heritage.
Pogmatog Magot (Creator Knows)
David
Laughing Horse Robinson, Chairman
The Kawaiisu Tribe, P.O. Box 20849, Bakersfield, CA 93390, horserobinson@hotmail.com
Link to Congressional Documents and Kawaiisu
pictograph and petroglyph solar and lunar calendars
The Kawaiisu are a
Southern California Native American tribe who are well known for elaborate
basketry, culture and rock art. The name "Kawaiisu"
was given to the tribe by neighboring people and over the course of academic
study has been the label that is most used. The Kawaiisu
language is unique in pronunciation and structure and is maintained amongst
tribal members to this day. It has been recorded in a grammar and dictionary
text produced by the University of California, Linguistics Division, in 1991. The State of California has designated an historic park, called Tomo Kahni, at the site of one of
our larger villages, near Tehachapi. This site has extensive rock art and
numerous grinding holes. The State of California is currently negotiating to acquire three other Kawaiisu rock art sites for state parks, one at the Antelope Valley Indian Museum near Palmdale, one near Rosemond
and one at San Emigdio, directly south of Bakersfield. There are also extensive Kawaiisu
village rock art sites at two local military installations: Edwards Air Force
Base and Naval Weapons Center. These two can be viewed on private tours.
The Kawaiisu are
unique amongst indigenous people because we have no migration story. From an
anthropological standpoint, this means we have always lived in the same place.
Even some of the most studied of the ancient civilizations in the America’s, for example the Aztec, have a migration story that
was passed down to each generation thru oral history. This lack of a migration
story explains why the Kawaiisu territorial
pictographs are often pre-dated by adjacent petroglyphs
and geoglyphs. The combination of Kawaiisu
pictographs and petroglyphs verify that our tribe has
lived in this region since time immemorial.
The Kawaiisu have
maintained an active government since the arrival of the Spanish. Tribal elders
have fostered continuous government-to-government relationships with each
country (Spain, Mexico, U.S.) and governing agency since then. The tribe today has
an elected tribal council of five members, with a general council of 30 adult
voting members. We have roll numbers and allotments. The United States has failed to put our tribe on the Federal Register
and as a result, many members live in extreme poverty without running water or
electricity. In spite of hardship we maintain our culture and traditional
ceremonies. Our tribal community is one of the most cohesive groups in the
Indian world today. We are incorporated in California and will soon complete our 501C3 paperwork so that we
are registered as non-profit at the federal level.
History: 1776 - Father Garces
documents the boundaries of the Kawaiisu territory
When the Spaniards arrived in the Americas they brought Franciscan and Jesuit monks to explore
and survey the new lands Spain had conquered. The territories delineated by the
priests became Spain’s guideline for mapping ancestral Native American lands. Father
Francisco Garces was one of the Franciscan monks. He
became the first European to document contact with the Kawaiisu
people and the extent of our tribal territory. His diaries record two trips in
1776, where he encountered several of the rancherias
of our tribe. Using the diaries of Father Garces and
cross referencing the 1965 Smithsonian Bureau of American Ethnology resource
called "Handbook of American Indians," you will discover that the Kawaiisu were described as Cobaji,
Cobajais, Cuabajai, Quabajai, Nochi, Noche and Noches Colteches. These tribal designations are indicated on maps
that illustrate the 1776 travels of Father Garces.
One of these maps is stored at the University of Arizona Library and is available to view on the Internet. The map
shows the route Father Garces took and illustrates
the extent of the tribal territory that Father Garces
described.

R. S. Felipe refers to the name Father Garces gave to what later became the Kern River. Our tribe is listed as Cobaji, Nochi and Quabajai and shows a
territory that spans an area from Death Valley in the
east, across the Tehachapi Mountain range and west to the Pacific Ocean.
The Kawaiisu
territory delineated by Father Garces was acknowledged
by the Spanish government and became a permanent land grant. Years later, when Mexico acquired Spanish territories their laws guaranteed
our Spanish land grant and rancheria ownership. (The
relevant laws are called Recopilacion de las Indias, Bk. 4, Tit. 12, Laws
5, 7, 9, 14, 18; Bk. 6, Tit. 3, Law 9; Hall, Mexican law, 36, 38, 40, 45, 49,
165; 2 White’s New Recopilacion, pp. 50, 52, 242.) In
1848, when the United States acquired the territory at the end of the Mexican War,
these Spanish and Mexican laws were guaranteed by treaty. Articles VIII and IX
of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo guaranteed ancestral Native American lands
and eventually led the U.S. Government to initiate what are known as the
"18 Treaties of California."
History: June 10, 1851 - The Kawaiisu sign Treaty
D, one of the 18 California Treaties
Between 1848 and 1851, the Kawaiisu found themselves in the
middle of a five way conflict: A) The U.S. Federal Government establishing new
western territories. B) Business investors trying to secure mining, oil and
water rights. C) California politicians who were seeking statehood. D) The
Euro-American population who did not understand the aboriginal language or
customs and wanted the Indians removed from the region. E) The Indian nations
of California who wanted to live undisturbed in their ancestral
homelands.
As an early result of these conflicts, the Kawaiisu Tribe agreed to enter into a treaty with the United States, ceding their huge Spanish land grant for a smaller
reserved tract. The tribal village Chairmen signed with both their Spanish and
Indian names. The signing took place on June 10, 1851 at old Tejon (Texon) Pass, which was southwest of the old Tejon ranch headquarters. The reserved tract included all
of the southern San
Joaquin Valley and surrounding mountains. A map on the American
Memory web site shows the original Spanish land grant held by the signing
tribal members and ceded by this treaty. It looks just like the travel maps
from Father Garces, showing a territory which extends
from Death Valley in the east, across the San Joaquin Valley to the Pacific
Ocean on the west and is listed as #286. This treaty was essentially a
quitclaim deed where we gave up the

rights to several million acres, in exchange for exclusive
control over 1.2 million acres. The 1.2 million acres that were to remain
reserved for tribal jurisdiction are shown on the same American Memory
government map as #285. The treaty describes reserved tract #285 as follows:
"beginning at the first forks of Kern
River…thence…to the Carises Lake, thence to Buena
Vista Lake, thence a straight line from…Buena Vista Lake to the nearest point
of the coast range of mountains, thence along the base of said range to the
mouth or westerly terminus of the Tejon Pass or
Canon, and from thence a straight line to the beginning…"
We signed the treaty in good faith and were
never told that our treaty was secretly shelved after the United States Senate
reviewed it and bowed to pressure from legislators and investors from California. The U.S. Government and The State of California
acted together, in bad faith, by doing nothing to keep their own internal and
political conflicts from impacting the peaceful lives of the Kawaiisu Tribe as they continued to live on their ancestral
homeland.
As the stories of California’s resources traveled east, wagon trains of new
settlers arrived. These easterners were seeking a good life with dreams of land
ownership at bargain prices. The Kawaiisu were living
and maintaining the terms of the treaty, yet miners, ranchers and settlers were
encroaching on our territory. Our tribe did not understand why this was
happening. It created a politically charged climate, inflamed when European men
sexually brutalized our women and children and senselessly killed thousands of
Indians to remove them from the land.
The United States was slow to step in and save us even though the
military had ongoing communication from California about the slaughters. Finally, on March 3, 1853 (10 Stat. 226, 238) Congress passed a bill to
establish and fund five reservations in California for the protection of the Indians. The first
reservation was the Tejon Reservation (also called
Sebastian Reservation) which was established in September 1853. It contained
75,000 acres which was surveyed and funded for that purpose.

A map on the American Memory web site shows
the reservation in September 1853 as #311.
On March 3, 1855 (10 Stat. 686, 699) Congress passed another Indian
funding bill that reduced each California reservation to only 25,000 acres. Tejon
Reservation was funded again but it was not re-surveyed to reflect the reduced
size, even though the Secretary of the Interior made that order on November 25,
1856.
Since that time there is no
Congressional or Presidential record indicating that the Tejon
Reservation was terminated or abolished. There is no record that the Kawaiisu Tribe
of Tejon was terminated. In fact, the Bureau of
Indian Affairs (BIA) had ongoing dialogue regarding the Tejon
Indians well into the 1940’s. In December 1915 a BIA agent noted there were 79
Indians living at Tejon Reservation and in October 1918
a BIA agent from the Tule River Agency noted there
were 80. The BIA sent correspondence discussing 12,000 acres for the Tejon Indians and in the 1920's built an Indian school on
the Tejon Reservation. In November 1924 the BIA
Commissioner noted 75 Indians, 20 of which attended the school on the
reservation. The Indian school was in operation on the reservation until 1945
when the teacher there retired and the Tejon Indian
children had to be transferred to other Kern County schools. The local paper photographed an Indian
burial on the reservation in 1964 and at least one descendant is still living
there.
It is not surprising then that the United States government issued trust lands to our tribal members.
These allotments are located throughout the original Spanish land grant
territory. Some of these allotment lands are currently active and many have
been stolen "by peaceful means."
History: June 1924 - Supreme Court rules
against Indians in favor of Tejon Ranch owners
The destiny of the Kawaiisu
Tribe has been impacted by a Southern
California land and mineral
rights grab, calculated to take advantage of the history of the times and the
long distance between California and the east coast seat of the U.S. Government. First
of all, California was lobbying to be accepted into the Union
as a state. The California State Legislature voted in their constitution in
December 1849, but did not become part of the Union
until September 1850. California legislators and business investors knew that
when a state enters the Union an Enabling Act is agreed to, allowing the new
state to appropriate unpatented lands. They were also well aware that a large
part of California’s open land was covered by Spanish land grants to
Native Americans.
The politicians in California worked quickly to create a new law that guaranteed
the outright theft of Native American ancestral homeland. The law was called
"An Act for the Government and Protection of Indians (Chapter 133,
Statutes of California, April 22, 1850). Even though Union politics had
determined that California could not legalize slavery, pro-slavery supporters in
the legislature found a way to get around the restriction. The "Act for
the Government and Protection of Indians" amounted to an Indian slavery
law. This law expanded the peonage system of free Indian labor for mining and
cattle interests. It also denied an Indian the right to testify against a white
person and made sure that the local constable notified Indians of their new
status.
Eleven months later, the U.S. Congress passed
the Enabling Act California politicians and investors had been lobbying for. The
"Act of March 3, 1851" (C.41, 9 Stat 631) assigned a two year
commission to review California’s Spanish land grants and had the commission hold
court in San
Francisco. All
Spanish and Mexican land grant holders were required to present their land
claims to the commission or abandon their rights forever. California Indians
were never informed about the San Francisco land commission hearings. They also had other
restrictions that prevented their appearance. Under the new California "Indian slave law" they were being
collected for free labor, rounded up and beaten or executed if they resisted.
As such our tribe never presented our claim to the commission, nor did the United States appear before the commission as a trustee for us.
Seventy years later, in 1924, the Supreme
Court decided a case in favor of Title Insurance and Trust Company, a water,
oil and newspaper syndicate which held the Tejon
Ranch patent. The Supreme Court held that by not appearing before the
commission the Indians had voluntarily abandoned their claim to the land.
Twenty years later, in the 1940’s, the Bureau of
Indian Affairs was using this case to deny federal recognition and services to
our tribe.
This legal proceeding should have been
reviewed and reversed long ago. When it was filed in 1920 and decided in 1924,
Native Americans were still prevented from testifying on their own behalf.
Because we had no input, many of the facts the court needed were never told.
The Tejon Ranch patent in question had been acquired
and packaged by Edward F. Beale. Beale was the officer who managed the Tejon Indian Reservation after he became the Superintendent
of Indian Affairs in February 1852. Beale enslaved the Indians and kept them
from the San
Francisco
commission hearings. He collected Tejon Reservation
funds from the government and began to acquire the land surrounding the
reservation. He was removed from his Bureau of Indian Affairs position in 1854
but gained the support of California
politicians. In 1856 California Governor Johnson commissioned Lieutenant Beale
as a Brigadier General and sent him fully empowered to make war on Southern California tribes who were causing trouble. To carry out the
views of the Governor, General Wool gave authority to General Beale to draw
forces from Fort Tejon for that purpose. Soon a group of California politicians and investors wrote to President Lincoln
and recommended him for a new position. In July 1861, Lincoln appointed Beale to the position of Surveyor-General
of California. In this position, Beale was in charge of surveying
and approving land patents. In the 2.5 years Beale was employed as
Surveyor-General thousands of acres of land patents were approved in his name,
land that had originally belonged to Native Americans. The very land patent in
question, in this Supreme Court case, had the Beale Surveyor-General stamp of
approval. The Supreme Court referred to an 1863 patent to a Mexican grantee,
but records show Beale was already the owner at that time. It was also common
knowledge that he moved the property lines and thereby manipulated the titles.
A simple review of Spanish/Mexican "rancho" property law and how
boundaries of "ranchos" and "rancherias"
interact would have brought his surveys into question. The Title Insurance and
Trust Company was never asked to prove those boundaries. The tarnished
reputation of General Beale quickly caught up with him. On February 17, 1864 President Lincoln fired Beale because of
misappropriation of Indian funds. Beale was supposed to return to Washington to give President Lincoln property deeds from the
ranchos and Native American land surrounding the Tejon
reservation. Instead Beale contacted President Lincoln and said he had lost the
deeds. President Lincoln removed Beale from office but no government agency
stepped in to ensure that the Tejon Indians were
protected. After losing his job, Beale joined investors to form the Star Oil
Company and claimed that all of the Tejon Indians had
been transferred to the Tule Reservation. BIA
correspondence discounts Beale’s claim. Well into the 1920’s, a Tule River Indian Agency agent and a BIA Commissioner
verified numerous Indians remaining to run the Tejon
Reservation cattle ranch, farming and mining operation. After
Beale died the family sold the ranch to the Title Insurance and Trust Company
who then took steps to evict the Indian reservation residents. They even
tricked the Indians into believing they had to pay the ranch rent so they would
not lose their land or jobs. When the Indians could not afford to pay the rent
the company used non-payment to go after the property by "peaceful
means."
Creating an economic development plan for
the Kawaiisu Tribe
In order to fight poverty and prevent the
deterioration of our culture and language, the Kawaiisu
Tribe of Tejon need to be federally recognized. Legal
precedent seems to indicate a favorable outcome if we choose to pursue
recognition. In one Supreme Court example called Mattz
vs. Arnett, 412 U.S. 481 (1973), the unanimous court ruled that the allotment
provisions of the Act of June 17, 1892 are completely consistent with continued reservation
status. In other words, by issuing allotments the Department of Interior and
Congress are continuing to recognize the existence of a tribe and it’s reservation. In that Supreme Court case the existence
of allotments reversed termination, led to the tribe’s Federal Recognition and
delineated "Indian Country" for the tribe. An area is typically
designated "Indian Country" when it is an aboriginal territory that
has been demonstrated to offer long standing cultural significance to the
tribe. This covers ancestral activities such as hunting and fishing,
traditional ceremonies like our annual pinoning and
most important in our case, the significant rock art which our tribe has
maintained since time immemorial. The courts have a record of designating
"Indian Country" as the land base that "is" deeded to the
tribe or that "once was" deeded to the tribe such as: English land
grants, Mexican land grants and Spanish land grants. If we choose to
investigate these legal avenues and prevail, the tribe will be able to develop
a viable plan for the future. This will begin with running water and electricity
and will eventually extend to healthcare, cultural enrichment and formal
education for our children.
Biography

"Wormie
Annie" 4 foot x 10 foot steel etching
David Laughing Horse Robinson is a direct
descendant and elected Chairman of the Kawaiisu
Tribe. He is an accomplished artist who uses steel sculpture and etchings to
convey the Native American symbols which are commonly used in Kawaiisu rock art. Laughing Horse has been researching and
documenting Kawaiisu solar and lunar calendars for
the past 15 years. He is in the process of presenting his research in
documentary video format, translating the scientific data recorded on petroglyphs and pictographs. The first documentary will
explain the history of why rock art exists in the America’s and why they occur where they do. Kate DeVries is the primary historian and researcher for the Kawaiisu Tribe. She is a video producer with eighteen years
experience writing, shooting and editing for television. Kate is writing the
scripts for the upcoming documentaries about the solar and lunar calendars of
the Kawaiisu Tribe.
For
more information on the Kawaiisu Tribe of Tejon
Write
to: The Kawaiisu Tribe, P.O. Box 20849, Bakersfield, CA 93390
Or
e-mail: horserobinson@hotmail.com
|

|
|
Petroglyph
Steps
|
|
|
|
|

|

|
|
Pictograph
cave south of Bakersfield
|
|
|
|
|

|

|