How to Avoid Plagiarism
© The Author; Last Modified 26 October 1998
is the presentation of another's words
or ideas as your own.
It is a bad thing. Don't do it.
Turning in a paper actually written by your room-mate and saying "I wrote this" would be a flagarant example of plagiarism. The same would be true if you were to buy a term paper from a "paper mill."
The lightest punishment for plagiarism of this sort would be a grade of zero for the paper. Other common punishments are failing the course or even expulsion from school. As you can see, plagiarism is a very serious offense in academia.
Plagiarism is wrong for several reasons.
First, it is lying. If you have been asked to write something as evidence that you have grasped the materials of the course you are taking, offering someone else's work as evidence is a lie. It is no different from having someone else take an examination in your name.
Second, it is an insult to your fellow students. When you plagiarize, just as when you cheat on an exam, you treat unfairly those who play by the rules. You seek an unfair advantage over them, and inevitably, you will find yourself looking down on those who devote their time and energy to the task which you have cheated on.
Third, when you use other people's words and ideas without their permission, it is stealing. It would be wrong to sneak into a factory and steal the products manufactured there during the day, and in the academy, words, ideas, paintings, compositions, sculpture, inventions, and other creations are what we produce. It is wrong to steal them and claim them as your own.
Plagiarism is a big deal in the academy.
There are many forms of plagiarism, some less flagrant than the examples I began with. However, you need to understand and avoid all forms of plagiarism. Presenting someone else's words or ideas as your own--in any form--constitutes plagiarism. Some forms of plagiarism are probably not obvious to you, so I want to spell them out in detail. I think much plagiarism is inadvertent and unknowing. I want to help you avoid that potential embarrassment.
Let's suppose you were assigned to write a book review of Theodore M. Porter's book, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995). In preparing to write your paper, you come across a book review by Lisa R. Staffen, published in Contemporary Sociology (March, 1996, Vol. 25, No., 2, pp. 154-156).
begins as follows:
|It has become fashionable to reject the notion of absolute objectivity on the grounds that objectivity is simply unattainable or, even if attainable, is undesirable.|
is good, active prose. Let's suppose you like it. More important, you imagine
that your instructor would like it a lot. You decide to start your
paper as follows. (I've indicated Staffen's original comment in red.)
|Plagiarism: I feel it has become fashionable to reject the notion of absolute objectivity on the grounds that objectivity is simply unattainable.|
be a clear case of plagiarism and therefore unacceptable. Adding "I feel"
at the beginning is a nice personal touch, but it doesn't change anything.
Let's tell the truth: you have probably not spent a lot of your waking hours
agonizing over "the notion of absolute objectivity," much less worrying
about whether others would reject the notion or embrace it with passion.
|Plagiarism: I feel it has become stylish to reject the idea of absolute objectivity on the grounds that objectivity cannot be achieved.|
Even editing the passage as I've done above would constitute plagiarism. While you have changed some of the words--"stylish" for "fashionable", "idea" for "notion," etc.--the idea being expressed, along with many of the phrases, have been taken from someone else, without acknowledging that fact.
Leaving off "I
feel," by the way, wouldn't absolve the sin. Anything you write in a term paper,
unless you indicate otherwise, is assumed to be your own, original thought.
It's fine to have original thoughts, incidentally. In fact, we encourage it.
We're happiest when your thoughts and opinions are based in evidence and reasoning
rather than rumor and belief, but don't feel that your professors are somehow
perversely thrilled by the mindless parrotting of ideas they already know about.
(I know it sometimes seems like that.)
|Plagiarism: Many people today have rejected the idea that there is such a thing as absolute objectivity since they do not believe that it can be achieved.|
Even though few of the original words remain in the passage above, the thought expressed has been taken from another writer and offered as your own. Even if you found a way to express Staffen's idea without using any of her original words, that would still constitute plagiarism. Sorry. If you're going to use someone else's words and/or ideas, you have to give them due credit.
Use someone else's words and ideas, go to jail. Well, it's not quite that bad, but academics don't have much sense of humor about cheating. I'll admit, I kind of enjoyed the student who turned in a paper his friend had written for the same course the preceding semester. He just whited-out his friend's name and typed his own over it--and you could read the original name from the back of the page. He took the course again.
There is nothing wrong with presenting someone else's words and ideas in a term paper or in a published, scholarly work. In fact, any field of thought evolves as people read each other's ideas, learn from and build on those ideas. The key to doing this properly lies in acknowledgement and citation.
When we borrow words and ideas from others, we acknowledge that we are doing so, and we give our readers a full bibliographic reference so they would be able to locate and read the original.
It might be useful for you to leaf through some academic journal articles. It will be clear that academics think it's fine to use other people's words and ideas. It's just important to use them appropriately. Use them as resources for building your own unique contribution to the ongoing conversation of ideas.
You might want to create a sculpture of an elephant. No problem. Get a block of granite and chip away everything that doesn't look like an elephant. Just don't pretend that you created the granite. (Unless you did, in which case I really apologize.)
Here's an example
of how you might properly include Staffen's comment in your term paper, with
a bibliographic entry at the end of the paper.
|Proper use: Lisa Staffen (1996:154) begins her review of Porter's book by suggesting "It has become fashionable to reject the notion of absolute objectivity on the grounds that objectivity is simply unattainable or, even if attainable, is undesirable."|
gets the information out for the reader, and it would be accompanied by an
appropriate bibliographic citation at the end of your paper:
|Bibliography: Lisa R. Staffen, "Featured Essays," Contemporary Sociology , March, 1996, Vol. 25, No., 2, pp. 154-156.|
are some other acceptable ways to use Staffen's passage. Each would be accompanied
with a bibliographic entry at the end of the paper.
|Proper use: In her review of Porter's book, Lisa Staffen (1996:154) says the idea of absolute objectivity is now commonly rejected as "simply unattainable or, even if attainable, [as] undesirable."|
|Proper use: According to Lisa Staffen (1996:154), it has become fashionable to reject the idea of absolute objectivity altogether.|
In summary, it is quite acceptable -- even desirable -- to include the ideas of others in your term paper. This can be a sign of good scholarship, as well as assuring your instructor that you've done some of the reading for the course. (We like to think you read some of it.)
However, it's important that you acknowledge and cite materials properly. The key is that your reader know what you are borrowing and how to look up the original materials.
By the way, if your instructor asks you to write a report on plagiarism, don't copy what you've just read here unless you cite it properly...