|
Principles of Community
California
State University, Bakersfield is a multicultural community
of persons from diverse backgrounds and sets of beliefs and
values. As a community our university is committed to
ensure that our programs, classes, lectures, activities and
everyday interactions are enriched by our acceptance of one
another and by striving to learn from each other in an
atmosphere of positive engagement and mutual respect. As a
university, we are committed to maintain a learning climate
free from expressions of bigotry, and to protect diversity
and lawful free speech. Our university affirms and seeks to
promote tolerance, civility, and mutual respect for
diversity of background, gender, ethnicity, race, religion,
political beliefs, sexual orientation, and physical
abilities.
Back to the top
Principles of Academic Freedom
Freedom
of inquiry and the open exchange of ideas are fundamental to
the vitality of our academic institutions. The notion that
freedom and national security are opposed denies the basic
premise of a free democratic society where open exchange of
information, public access to vital information, and ability
to openly challenge governmental decisions without fear of
reprisals, increases rather than hinders national security.
The
principles of academic freedom are critical to ensure higher
education’s important contribution to the common good.
Basic academic freedom includes the ability to do research
and publish the freedom to teach and the freedom to
communicate extramurally.
California State University is committed to assuring that
all persons may exercise the rights of free expression,
speech, and assembly and affirm below the following
statements and principles.
1.
CSU, Bakersfield strongly reaffirms its commitment to uphold
and preserve the principles of Academic Freedom as contained
in the 1940 Association of University Professors (AAUP)
Statement on Academic Freedom and Tenure with the 1970
Interpretive Comments. These principles and comments have
been widely adopted by many universities and Associations of
Higher Education in the United States.
2.
CSU, Bakersfield affirms that these principles reflect the
fundamental mission of the University to discover and
disseminate knowledge to its students and the society at
large. CSU, Bakersfield shall support the pursuit of
excellence and academic freedom in teaching, research, and
learning through the free exchange of ideas among faculty,
students, and staff. The university and its community
recognizes that quality education requires an atmosphere of
academic freedom and academic responsibility for academic
freedom is always accompanied by a corresponding concept of
responsibility to the University and its students and the
University and its students to its faculty and staff.
3.
CSU, Bakersfield reaffirms that it is the faculty who have
primary responsibility for and jurisdiction over
establishing hiring criteria for faculty positions; that
these criteria must derive exclusively from the professional
standards set forth by scholarly/professional organizations
and by campus faculty (according to the shared governance
processes of the University); and that conditions of hiring
never include reference to an individual’s political
affiliations.
4.
CSU, Bakersfield affirms that academic freedom for student
rests first upon their access to a high quality education
and their right to pursue a field of study that they deem
appropriate and desirable.
5.
CSU, Bakersfield reaffirms its support of the principles of
academic freedom as they apply to the rights of students in
a class and university environment that fosters civil
discourse, respect, open inquiry and freedom of expression.
6.
CSU, Bakersfield affirms further that these principles also
support the University’s mission to foster in students a
maturity and independence of mind by providing within the
class and university an environment where students as well
as faculty are free to express the widest range of
viewpoints within the standards of scholarly inquiry and
professional ethics.
7.
Students have the right to disagree with the conduct or
content of courses and to seek change, but such freedom does
not include the right to disrupt orderly classroom
activities or to avoid fulfillment of expectations of the
course. Academic freedom for faculty members must include a
means for seeking the censure or dismissal of students
guilty of disruption, destruction, or unethical classroom
behavior. This is done through the established university
discipline procedures.
8.
Academic freedom for students includes the rights of
students to be fairly and competently evaluated and graded.
Punitive grading is not acceptable except in the cases of
cheating or plagiarism. The university provides established
Student Grievance Procedures for students to seek redress in
such matters.
9.
Academic freedom includes the rights of both faculty and
students to seek censure of faculty members by complaint,
petition, or seeking discipline for incompetence or
unprofessional behavior including improper and clearly
documented intrusion on student rights to academic freedom.
The university provides established procedures through its
Committee on Professional Responsibilities for such
redress. Complaints about infringement of such rights
should be brought either to the Provost and Vice President
for Academic Affairs or the University Ombudsman and then,
after review, forwarded to the Chair of the Committee on
Professional Responsibilities. Before such formal action is
sought the normal informal procedures for grievance
resolution should be followed. These informal procedures
are described in the “Student Complaint and Academic
Grievance Procedures” which may be found on the web page of
Undergraduate Studies (http://www.csub.edu/undergraduatestudies)
Back to the top
Philosophy Statement Regarding Academic Freedom in the
Classroom
- No student has a right to have a professor that won’t
offend them...They have a right to a professor who will
grade them fairly. They have a right to a professor who will
protect their academic freedom.
It is
acceptable to express any and all ideas regardless of
political perspective, gender orientation, race or
religion. In fact it is our obligation to do so.
Instructors often present controversial opinions (some of
which they do not personally believe to be true) in order to
stimulate conversations and higher reasoning amongst
students. This ability must not be eroded. The expression
of different points of view is not only our right but also
our responsibility. Although we cannot control the
interpretations of others, we must always remember why we
are here: to enlighten, nurture and educate. Punitive
action in any form is not acceptable if it is based on the
fact that another person has an ideologically divergent
opinion. It is our responsibility to try to provide an
environment of mutual respect in which individuals can
express their opinions.
|