I.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT and ATTACHMENT
The need for this project is evident
in the large number of students in the Delano Joint Union High School District
(DJUHSD) who are at the poverty level, who have scored at or below basic on
the CST, who have not passed the CAHSEE, who are English Learners, in addition
to the number of non-credentialed teachers. Delano has also been identified
a high priority, program improvement district (NCLB) this past year.
According to the US census data, and as related on the CPEC website, 31% of
the families in DJUHSD are at the poverty level k(See Table 6, Attachment).
According to the CBEDS data, 77% of the teachers at DJUHSD are fully credentialed,
as opposed to 95% of the teachers in Kern County being fully credentialed.
This number is expected to rise as the district grows. This year the district
expects to hire 12 new teachers. Twenty-three percent of the teachers are
teaching subjects outside their area and/or are new to the profession, lacking
professional development to complete credentials (See Table 4, Attachment).
At DJUHSD for 2004, 61% of the total school population passed the Math section
of the CAHSEE and 55% passed the English Language Arts section. Of the 3,936
students enrolled in DJUSHD, 1,892 are identified English Learners which increases
the need for teachers trained in English language learner teaching strategies
(See Table 5, Attachment). Fourty-four percent of the parents in this district
have not achieved a high school diploma.
Approximately 50% or better of all students at DJUHSD score at Below Basic
or Far Below Basic on the CST. Based on prior observations, prior consulting
with the district and district data, there is grave concern that English Learners
are not able to pass the ACES (the District’s local CA standard benchmark
assessments) in Math or Science. Nearly 50% of the English Learners do not
pass the ACES in Math or Science.
The data clearly indicates a compelling need for professional development
intervention to improve student performance. The data for the identified subgroups
dictates a need to implement teaching strategies which emphasize academic
language instruction (only 4% of the student population are Caucasian, 78%
are Hispanic and 48% are identified English Learners).
The foundational model for the professional development is a prior project
model entitled “ELDPI” which was implemented from 2000-2003. The
ELDPI institute emphasized academic language instruction for secondary teachers
across the content areas. Research conducted for this model (in submission
for the Bilingual Research Journal) determined that the ELDPI’s were
extremely successful in raising student achievement across the grade levels
and content areas on the SAT9, from 2000-2002. This grant proposal is structured
on the researched based institutes (the English Language Development Professional
Institutes—ELDPI), which applied rigorous, systemic and objective procedures
to obtain knowledge of teaching competencies that improved student academic
achievement. This professional development model is researched based and is
described by researchers: Margarita Calderon 1986, Beverley Showers, and Bruce
Joyce, 1980. Dr. Emilio Garza, one of co-directors, worked closely with Dr.
Margarita Calderon, researcher and trainer, in Fresno County Office of Education
with the peer coaching model that trained over 100 teachers in working with
English language learners. Darling-Hammond 1998, also supports this model
“of sustained, experiential, collaborative…“resulting in
higher student achievement.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT ATTACHMENT
Delano Joint Union High School
is low-performing high school district with high poverty, and a high English
learner school population. The table below provides the need for assistance.
|
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Borrego, I. and Cook Hirai, D.
(2003). “Classes on Camera” , The Language Magazine, Journal of
Communication and Education. June 2003
California Department of Education,
(2003). DataQuest. www.cde.ca.gov
Calderon, M. (1986) Multi-district
trainer of trainers institute (MTTI): A trainer of trainers model focused
on acquisition of literacy by limited –English proficient students,
Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.
Clair, Nancy (2000). “Teaching
Educators About Language: Principles, Structure, and Challenges”. CAL
Digests on Professional Development. Nov.2000
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998) “Teacher
learning that supports student learning” Educational Leadership 55 (5),
6-11.
Darling-Hammond, Linda, Chung,
Ruth and Frelow, Fred (September/October, 2002).
Variation in Teacher Preparation: How Well do Different Pathways Prepare Teachers
To Teach? Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 53, No. 4
Dutro, Susana & Carol Moran, “Rethinking English Language Instruction:
An Architectural Approach”, In Gilbert G. Garcia (Ed.), English Learners
Reaching the Highest Level of English Literacy (pp.227-258). Columbus, Ohio:
Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Joyce, B. & Showers, B, (1980)
Improving In service training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership,
pg 379-385.
Killion, Joellen (Spring, 2003).
Use These 6 Keys to Open Doors to Literacy. Journal
of Staff Development Vol. 24, No.2, pgs. 12-15
Kunzman, Robert (May/June, 2003).
From Teacher to Student: The Value of Teacher Education for Experienced Teachers.
Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 54, No 3
Mellander, Gustavo, A (1/06/03).
The Changing Face of Teacher Education. The
Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 7 (pg. 8)
Scarcella, R. (2003). Accelerating
Academic English: A Focus on the English Learner,
Regents of the University of California. pg 19
PT3 (Preparing Tomorrow’s
Teachers to Use Technology) federal grant. (2000)
[Online]. Available: http://www.projecttnt.com |