calli_Banner
I. NEEDS ASSESSMENT and ATTACHMENT

The need for this project is evident in the large number of students in the Delano Joint Union High School District (DJUHSD) who are at the poverty level, who have scored at or below basic on the CST, who have not passed the CAHSEE, who are English Learners, in addition to the number of non-credentialed teachers. Delano has also been identified a high priority, program improvement district (NCLB) this past year.
According to the US census data, and as related on the CPEC website, 31% of the families in DJUHSD are at the poverty level k(See Table 6, Attachment). According to the CBEDS data, 77% of the teachers at DJUHSD are fully credentialed, as opposed to 95% of the teachers in Kern County being fully credentialed. This number is expected to rise as the district grows. This year the district expects to hire 12 new teachers. Twenty-three percent of the teachers are teaching subjects outside their area and/or are new to the profession, lacking professional development to complete credentials (See Table 4, Attachment).
At DJUHSD for 2004, 61% of the total school population passed the Math section of the CAHSEE and 55% passed the English Language Arts section. Of the 3,936 students enrolled in DJUSHD, 1,892 are identified English Learners which increases the need for teachers trained in English language learner teaching strategies (See Table 5, Attachment). Fourty-four percent of the parents in this district have not achieved a high school diploma.
Approximately 50% or better of all students at DJUHSD score at Below Basic or Far Below Basic on the CST. Based on prior observations, prior consulting with the district and district data, there is grave concern that English Learners are not able to pass the ACES (the District’s local CA standard benchmark assessments) in Math or Science. Nearly 50% of the English Learners do not pass the ACES in Math or Science.
The data clearly indicates a compelling need for professional development intervention to improve student performance. The data for the identified subgroups dictates a need to implement teaching strategies which emphasize academic language instruction (only 4% of the student population are Caucasian, 78% are Hispanic and 48% are identified English Learners).
The foundational model for the professional development is a prior project model entitled “ELDPI” which was implemented from 2000-2003. The ELDPI institute emphasized academic language instruction for secondary teachers across the content areas. Research conducted for this model (in submission for the Bilingual Research Journal) determined that the ELDPI’s were extremely successful in raising student achievement across the grade levels and content areas on the SAT9, from 2000-2002. This grant proposal is structured on the researched based institutes (the English Language Development Professional Institutes—ELDPI), which applied rigorous, systemic and objective procedures to obtain knowledge of teaching competencies that improved student academic achievement. This professional development model is researched based and is described by researchers: Margarita Calderon 1986, Beverley Showers, and Bruce Joyce, 1980. Dr. Emilio Garza, one of co-directors, worked closely with Dr. Margarita Calderon, researcher and trainer, in Fresno County Office of Education with the peer coaching model that trained over 100 teachers in working with English language learners. Darling-Hammond 1998, also supports this model “of sustained, experiential, collaborative…“resulting in higher student achievement.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT ATTACHMENT

Delano Joint Union High School is low-performing high school district with high poverty, and a high English learner school population. The table below provides the need for assistance.

 

Table 1 Demographic Description of Schools to be Served

High School
Ethnic Majority Hispanic
English Learner Population
Free & Reduced Lunchg Program
Delano High School
95%
53%
88%
Ceasar Chavez High School
94%
49%
89%


Table 2 California Standards Test

Delano High School

Language Arts

All Students Above 50% English Learners Above 50% Disadvantaged Above 50% Male Above 50% Female Above 50%
1999
65%
16%
65%
60%
69%
2000
73%
33%
73%
71%
76%
Mathematics
1999
71%
48%
71%
70%
72%
2000
76%
59%
76%
77%
75%

 

Table 3
GROWTH IN API SCORES 2003-2004

Delano Joint Union High School
(Decile 1)
2003 API Base 2004 API Growth 2003-04 Growth Target 2003-04 Actual Growth 2003-04 Growth Beyond Target
All Students
535
550
n/a*
+15
n/a*
Hispanic
512
528
n/a*
+16
n/a*
Filipino
630
654
n/a*
+24
n/a*
Socio-economically Disadvantaged
521
536
n/a*
+15
n/a*


*Delano High School is an ASAM school

 

Table 4 Percent of Fully Credentialed Teachers 2004-20

L.E.A. /SCHOOL
PERCENT
Delano Unif. Sch. Dist. (Average)
77.1
Delano High School
74.7
Cesar Chavez High School
77.6

 

Table 5
Percent English Proficiency on CELDT
for 2003-2004 2004-2005 and Average Comparison with Kern County and CA State Averages

LEA/SCHOOL 2003-2004 2004-2005 Average
2003-2005
CountyAverage
2003-2005
(Grades 9-12)
State Average
2003-2004
(Grades 9-12)
Delano Unif. Sch. Dist.
51.3%
55.3%
53.3%
50%
59%
Cesar Chavez High School
46%
56%
51%
50%
59%
Delano High School
52%
57%
54.5%
50%
59%
Valley Continuation High School
56%
53%
54.5%
50%
59%

http://datal.cde.ca.gov/dataquest


Table 6
Us Census Poverty Statistics for Districts to be Served

District Grade Range Total population Relevant 5-17 age Relevant 5-17 age
Families in poverty
Percent Meets “high need” criteria
Delano Union High School District
9-12
58, 918
3560
1089
.3059
Yes

http://www.cpec.ca.gov/FederalPrograms/EligibleDistricts.xls

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Borrego, I. and Cook Hirai, D. (2003). “Classes on Camera” , The Language Magazine, Journal of Communication and Education. June 2003

California Department of Education, (2003). DataQuest. www.cde.ca.gov

Calderon, M. (1986) Multi-district trainer of trainers institute (MTTI): A trainer of trainers model focused on acquisition of literacy by limited –English proficient students, Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.

Clair, Nancy (2000). “Teaching Educators About Language: Principles, Structure, and Challenges”. CAL Digests on Professional Development. Nov.2000

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998) “Teacher learning that supports student learning” Educational Leadership 55 (5), 6-11.

Darling-Hammond, Linda, Chung, Ruth and Frelow, Fred (September/October, 2002).
Variation in Teacher Preparation: How Well do Different Pathways Prepare Teachers
To Teach? Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 53, No. 4

Dutro, Susana & Carol Moran, “Rethinking English Language Instruction: An Architectural Approach”, In Gilbert G. Garcia (Ed.), English Learners Reaching the Highest Level of English Literacy (pp.227-258). Columbus, Ohio: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Joyce, B. & Showers, B, (1980) Improving In service training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, pg 379-385.

Killion, Joellen (Spring, 2003). Use These 6 Keys to Open Doors to Literacy. Journal
of Staff Development Vol. 24, No.2, pgs. 12-15

Kunzman, Robert (May/June, 2003). From Teacher to Student: The Value of Teacher Education for Experienced Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 54, No 3

Mellander, Gustavo, A (1/06/03). The Changing Face of Teacher Education. The
Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 7 (pg. 8)

Scarcella, R. (2003). Accelerating Academic English: A Focus on the English Learner,
Regents of the University of California. pg 19

PT3 (Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to Use Technology) federal grant. (2000)
[Online]. Available: http://www.projecttnt.com


Staffing for Project

Dr. Emilio Garza
Dr. Debra Cook Hirai
Dr. Efrain Rodriguez
Dr. Irene Borrego
Dr. Tawnya Conradi
Dr. Carl Kloock

Home Resources About CALLI Video News