http://www.csub.edu/~lvega/442sylfal12.html
SYLLABUS
PSYCHOLOGY 442:  Psychology of Intergroup Relations
(CRN=80537 Sec.1) Fall 2012 - -Main Campus
Mon & Wed 12:45 p. m. -- 2:50 p. m.  (DDH 105H)

INSTRUCTOR
Luis A. Vega, Ph.D.lvega@csub.edu.
http://www.csub.edu/~lvega/.
Office: DDH 111D  (Tel. 654-3024)
Office Hours: Mo
9:30 a.m.-12:15 p.m.
We
10:00 a.m.-12:15 p.m.,
by appointment
TEACHING ASSISTANTS
 
       Student TA  Shamir G.
  Email:
 
  Hours:  

 


In this class we will use the Learning Management System--Blackboard:
http://www.csub.edu/els/bb9/

COURSE DESCRIPTION
An in-depth analysis of theories and principles about intergroup relations, with special attention given to the social psychology of minorities. Topics include an historical and comparative review of research and theory in intergroup relations; current theory and research on social identity, stereotypes, attitudes; and applications of the literature to contemporary societal problems. This class meets the Gender, Race, and Ethnicity requirement for the 1997-2013 catalogs. Recommended: Psychology 312-Social Psychology.
Note: This is  a seminar class, NOT a lecture class, so come prepared to be involved in class discussions of the readings.

COURSE OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this course is to introduce students to the concepts and tools necessary for the study of intergroup relations. To successfully complete this course, students must demonstrate competency in 12 objectives that, if successfully met, will allow students to

  1. Evaluate, appreciate, and constructively criticize published articles in intergroup relations.
  2. Apply intergroup relations' theories to explain the status of marginalized and disemfranchised groups.
  3. Know how to apply strategic solutions to the plight of ethnic minorities, women, people with disabilities, and other oppressed groups.
  4. Understand and justify methodological and theoretical strengths and limitations of published studies.
  5. Use appropriate computer and web venues to find appropriate intergroup relations articles.
  6. Use the literature to write and justify a research question in at least one area of intergroup relations.
  7. Derive testable hypotheses from the intergroup relations literature.
  8. Describe and evaluate validity strengths and weaknesses of intergroup relations findings.
  9. Describe and propose alternative explanations to intergroup relations findings.
  10. Analyze the role of privilege and power in the relationship between oppressed and oppressor.
  11. Write reports using correct APA (or MLA) styles.
  12. Respond with informed answers to class discussions on intergroup relations topics.
Please see below, under "Outcomes Assessment," for specification of goals and objectives for the Psychology Major covered by this class.

REQUIRED TEXTS can be found at the university bookstore:
Allport, G. W. (1954).  The nature of prejudice (1st ed.).  Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2001) Intergroup relations: Readings in social psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Rediscovering Social Identity: Key Readings. New York: Psychology Press.

REQUIRED JOURNAL ARTICLES can be found at the
university's library system:
Boring, Edwin G.(1951). The woman problem. American Psychologist, 6, 679-682.
Eagly. A., & Eaton, A., rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis
of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67, 211-230.
Eagly. A., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution
of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
46, 735-754.
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really
fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 11, 1139-1150.
Mohr, J. J.; & Fassinger, R.  E. (2006). Sexual orientation identity and
romantic relationship quality in same-sex couples. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1085-1099.
Patterson, C. J. (2006). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 5, 241-244.
Tyler, T. R., & Barry, H. (2009). The other side of injustice: When unfair procedures
increase group-serving behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1026-1032.
Winerman, L. (2011, September). Closing the achievement gap: Could a 15-minute gap intervention boost
ethnic-minority student achievement? Monitor in Psychology, 42(8), 36-40.
(http://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/09/achievement.aspx)
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of
self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction.Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 10, 109–120.

ELECTRONIC RESOURCES
  1. Writing_the Research Report  --  http://methods.fullerton.edu/appa.html
  2. Psych_Web Resources (Russ Dewey) --http://www.psychwww.com/
  3. Elements_of Style (Strunk & White) --http://www.bartleby.com/141/index.html
  4. American_Psychological Assoc. --http://www.apa.org/
  5. American_Psychological Society --http://www.psychologicalscience.org
  6. Western_Psychological Association --http://www.westernpsych.org
  7. Social_Psychology Network --http://www.socialpsychology.org/
  8. Classics in the History of Psychology --http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/
  9. Encyclopedia of Psychology --http://www.psychology.org
  10. APA style--worth browsing --http://www.apastyle.org    
  11. English writing tutorials --http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
  12. Understanding Prejudice --http://www.understandingprejudice.org/
  13. Common Objectives [Prejudice reduction] --http://www.jigsaw.org/ 
  14. Multicultural Psychology -- http://www.psychwatch.com/multi_page.htm
  15. Psychology Degree Information -- http://www.psychologydegree.net/ 

CLASS SCHEDULE

Fall 2012 Calendar & Dates to Remember Link>  http://www.csub.edu/facultyaffairs/files/calendar/AcademicCalendar2012.pdf
DATE
READINGS
TOPIC/ Readings
Quizzes
9/10 M
A / H&A/ Introduction- The Nature/Nurture Debate of Prejudice 
Readings: Preface of all books     (Read H& A Appendix, p. 403)
Boring, Edwin G.(1951). The woman problem. American Psychologist, 6, 679-682.<Link>
-------
9/12 W A 1-8
(pp. 1-140)
Psychology of the Outroup: Emergence and Maintenance
Part i. preferential thinking
1. what is the problem?    
2. the normality of prejudgment
3. formation of in-groups
4. rejection of out-groups
5. patterning and extent of prejudice
part ii. group differences 
6. the scientific study of group differences 
7. racial and ethnic differences 
8. visibility and strangeness
article
Winerman, L. (2011, September). Closing the achievement gap: Could a 15-minute gap intervention boostethnic-minority student achievement? Monitor in Psychology, 42(8), 36-40. <Link>
-------




9/17 M A 9-16
(pp. 142-296)
Psychology of Group Differences:  Value of Markers
9. traits due to victimization 
part iii. perceiving and thinking about group differences      
10. the cognitive process 
11. linguistic factors 
12. stereotypes in our culture 
13. theories of prejudice
part iv. sociocultural factors      
14. social structure and cultural pattern 
15. choice of scapegoats 
16. the effect of contact
Q1
9/19 W A 17-24
(pp. 297-392)
Situational Bases of Prejudice: Learned or Predisposed?
part v. acquiring prejudice      
17. conforming 
18. the young child 
19. later learning 
20. inner conflict 
part vi. the dynamics of prejudice      
21. frustration 
22. aggression and hatred 
23. anxiety, sex, guilt 
24. projection
articles
Mohr, J. J.; & Fassinger, R.  E. (2006). Sexual orientation identity andromantic relationship quality in same-sex couples. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 32, 1085-1099.
Patterson, C. J. (2006). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Current Directionsin Psychological Science, 5, 241-244.
Q2




9/24 M A 25-31
(pp. 395-519)
A Second Look at Prejudice: Interventions--Successes--Failures
part vii. character structure      
25. the prejudiced personality 
26. demagogy 
27. the tolerant personality 
28. religion and prejudice 
30. evaluation of programs 
31. limitations and horizons
articles
Eagly. A., & Eaton, A., rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysisof a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67, 211-230.
Eagly. A., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distributionof women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46, 735-754.
Q3
9/26 W


H & A 
EXAM 1 
Intergroup relations overview
-------




10/1 M H & A 1 Personality and Indivividual Differences (Proposal 1 Due)
Pettigrew, T. (1959). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29-42.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
article
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation ofself-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction.Journal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 10, 109–120.
Q4
10/3 W H & A 2 Goal relations and interdependence
 Sherif, J. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349-356.
 Bobo, L. and V. Hutchings. 1996. Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of Group Position in a multiracial social context. American  Sociological Review, 61, 951-971.
Q5




10/8 M H & A 3 Social identity & group identification
Tajfel, H., & Turner, j. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & s.Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations  (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA; Brooks/Cole.
Hogg, M., & Hains, S. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309.
Q6
10/10 W H & A 4 Intergroup attitudes & explanations   
Tajfel, H. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In J.C. Turner, & H. Giles (Eds.). Intergroup behavior (pp. 144-167). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. 
Dovidio, J., & Gaertner, S., 1996. Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 51-75.
Pettigrew, T. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
Q7




10/15 M H & A 5 Intergroup behavior & discrimination
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102. 
 
Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Blanz, J. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and gegative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568-581.     
Tyler, T., deGoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psycholocgical dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
Q8
10/17 W H & A 6 Motives for group membership/behavior
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of  Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482
Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity in a changing context: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243-251
Q9




10/22 M H & A 7 Influence in intergroup context
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
 Moscovici, S. & Personnaz., B. (1980). Minority influence and conversion behavior in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 270-282.
Q10
10/24 W H & A 8 Disadvantage & relative deprivation  (Media Project Due)
Reicher, S. D. (1984), The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21.
Vanneman R. D., & Pettigrew T. F. ( 1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461-486.
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
Q11




10/29 M H & A 9 Contact & social harmony
Gaertner, S. L. , Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 239-249.
 
Wilder, D. A. (1984). Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 177-194.
Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710
Q12
10/31 W
article
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes reallyfading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 11, 1139-1150. 

(EXAM 2)--last hour
-------




11/5 M P & B
(Class Paper  Proposal Due)
Part 1. Social Identity Introduction. T. Postmes, N.R. Branscombe, Sources of Social Identity. J.C. Turner, K.J. Reynolds, The Story of Social Identity.  Tajfel's Vision for a Social Psychology. H. Tajfel, Experiments in a Vacuum. H. Tajfel, Individuals and Groups in Social Psychology.
Q13
11/7 W P & B (Class Paper  Due)
Part 2. The Development of Social Identity Theory. H. Tajfel, Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour. H. Tajfel, Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup Behaviour. H. Tajfel, Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison. H. Tajfel, The Achievement of Group Differentiation. H. Tajfel, The Social Psychology of Minorities. H. Tajfel, J.C. Turner, An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. H. Tajfel, Social Stereotypes and Social Groups.
Q14




11/12 M P & B HOLIDAYVeterans Day Observed – Campus Closed
Part 3. Conceptual and Meta-theoretical Foundations of Self-categorization Theory. J.C. Turner, Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. J.C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, The Significance of the Social Identity Concept for Social Psychology with Reference to Individualism, Interactionism and Social Influence.
Q15
11/14 M
P & B Part 4. Development and Elaboration of Self-categorization Theory. J.C. Turner, Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. J.C. Turner, The Analysis of Social Influence. J.C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, S.A. Haslam, C. McGarty, Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context. J.C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, The Socially Structured Mind. J.C. Turner, R.S. Onorato, Social Identity, Personality, and the Self-Concept: A Self-Categorization Perspective.
Q16
11/19 M P & B Part 5. Conclusions. S.A. Haslam, N. Ellemers, S.D. Reicher, K.J. Reynolds, M.T. Schmitt, The Social Identity Perspective Today: The Impact of Its Defining Ideas. S.A. Haslam, N. Ellemers, S.D. Reicher, K.J. Reynolds, M.T. Schmitt, The Social Identity Perspective Tomorrow: Opportunities and Avenues for Advance.
article
Tyler, T. R., & Barry, H. (2009). The other side of injustice: When unfair proceduresincrease group-serving behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1026-1032.
Q17
11/26 M-FinalEXAM III (2:00 p.m. -- 4:30 p.m.) 

       
*A=Allport;  H & A=Hogg & Abrams;  P=Postmes & Branscombe .  

GRADING

17 Quizzes
Test 1
Test 2
Media Project
Class Paper
Chatroom Participation --3 class blog discussions

Final-Test 3 

TOTAL
85
50
50
50
70
15
80

400
A = 92-100% B- = 80-81.9% D+ = 68-69.9%
A- = 90-91.9% C+ = 78-79.9% D = 62-67.9%
B+ = 88-89.9% C = 72-77.9% D- = 60-61.9%
B = 82-87.9% C- = 70-71.9% F = 0-59.9%
QUIZZES
You need to read the assigned readings before class, for class discussion is dependent on your knowledge of the readings. Quizzes will be ready 24 hours before the class, and they can be taken in Blackboard (under "assessments" http://www.csub.edu/els/bb9/). You will not be able to take the quiz after the class begins, so please make arrangements to take them before hand. Each quiz is worth 5 points.

TESTS 1 & 2: Tests will consist of class readings and discussions. Multiple choice, fill in the answer, and essay questions will comprise the tests (50 points each).

MEDIA PROJECT With the technological changes we are witnessing, more than ever it is important to have tech-literacy. In this class you will have the choice of creating an enhanced (a) Powerpoint presentation, a (b) webpage with mulitple levels or frames, or (c) a short video-documentary. These media projects will be required in this class for each student, in lieu of individual presentations--given the large size of this class. The topic of this project will be applying social psychology to an intergroup issue, such as reducing prejudice/discrimination of a target group, improving positive intergroup behavior, or any other topic that is of interest to you in the social psychology of intergroup relations. The goal is to be informative,demonstrate knowledge from this course, and use research-based evidence. Possible groups you may use in this assignment include:  

  • People with disabilities
  • Ethnic groups
  • Fat people
  • Women
  • Old people
  • Short people
  • Religious groups
  • Sexual orientation
  • (un)Attractive people
  • Veterans
  • Political idiology
  • Pick your category

The media project must:

  1. provide an "Executive Summary" of what it will present
  2. include a precise statement of the problem/issue to be presented/discussed or a call to action
  3. provide relevant, theoretical and empirical sources substantiating the problem/issue
  4. elaborate a method or a "how to" approach to solution(s) of the problem/issue
  5. build a list of resources and sources that will be needed in your stated solution(s)
  6. outline a "Plan of Action" that provides specific steps
  7. explain what possible "Lesson's Learned" may emerge from your plan
  8. present "best practices" in solution-based strategies
  9. delineate possible limitations and shortcomings to your plan--substantiate throgh sources
Instructions on the technical aspects of approaching these projects will be provided in class, including possible technological tools to use.  It will help you conceptualize this assignment if you treated it as a resource for fellow technophiles or a project you would do as a social activist.

Grading criteria for these projects include: (a) relevance of topic, (b) information quality/substance, (c) writing qualitity/effectiveness, (d) appropriate applications of class material, (e) visual appeal and use of technology(colors / fonts / backgroun colors), and (f) quality of sources used, including the use of a references section.(50 points)  See Class Schedule above for due date.

CLASS PAPER: For this paper you will do a formal research paper using a top-bottom approach.  Specifically, you will pick any of the theories we discuss in class, and then you will examine the literature to see how well the theory's predictions (top) receive support in the literature (bottom). Although you can use some of the articles we will be reading for class, you will also need to use an additional ten articles published in the last two years. If you like, you can based your writing in the same problem area you chose for your webpage, but keep the emphasis unique to each assignment (75 points). Due date listed in class schedule. (Paper proposal is optional)

EVALUATION Criteria for course papers:

  1. Defining an appropriate, limited topic.
  2. Selection and description of appropriate literature.
  3. Reasonable application of psychological principles and research methodology.
  4. Thoughtful discussion of implications of the research.
  5. Writing, including proper use of APA or MLA styles, grammar, syntax, style, etc.
To improve your grade in your paper, I suggest you use a good outline and that you consider organizing strategies for your evidence such as those proposed by Moss and Holder (1988; p. 18):
 
summarize 
evaluate 
contrast
explain 
describe 
define
compare 
discuss 
criticize
justify 
trace 
interpret
prove 
illustrate 
analyze
source: Moss, A., & Holder, C. (1988). Improving student writing: A guidebook for faculty in all disciplines. Dubuque, IW: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

CHATROOM PARTICIPATION -- Chatrooms will be created in Blackboard for student discussion and contributions. The chatrooms will be divided by (a) reactions to class readigns, (b) class material in the news, (c) blogging on topics from class, and (d) increasing intergroup harmony. Student participation is required in all four chatrooms, with 15 points allocated to these activities. Grades on these activities will be based on a 1-page summary that each student will write documenting participation. More instructions will be given in class (due on the last day of classes).

FINAL EXAM -- The final exam will be comprehensive and based on class materials, class discussions, and class papers. Multiple choice, fill in the answer, and essay questions will comprise the final (80 points).

GENERAL INFORMATION
  1. Per the CSUB University Catalog and pursuant to Title 5, California Code of Regulations, § 41301. Standards for Student Conduct, CSUB students must adhere to laws, rules, standards, responsibilities, and expectations inherent with being a CSUB student. Specifically, acts of student misconduct such as academic dishonesty, interference with instructional activities, activities endangering the well being of the university community, as well as criminal activity of any kind will result in disciplinary actions, including expulsion and/or referal/involvement of local, state, and federal law enforcement angencies (see p. 90-91 of the 2011/13 catalog ---http://www.csub.edu/catalog/2011-2013_regularlyUpdated/pages/012.pdf).  
  2. Make-up exams given only in the event of medical emergencies.
  3. Late papers or assignments will NOT be accepted.
OUTOCOMES ASSESSMENT
Psychology
Higher education "shareholders" increasingly demand high leverage for every dollar spent in our universities. As such, teaching and learning accountability is demanded in demonstrable terms for both professors and students. The psychology department had a portfolio process (fall 1998 to spring 2002) to demonstrate that teaching and learning goals and objectives were being met. Since spring 2002, the Psychology Department has revised the outcomes assessment process to yield higher reliability, validity, and ease of application. Effective winter 2005, all students taking psychology courses can be expected to be part of the outcomes assessment process, either through direct or embedded means. By direct, we mean that specific assessment tests will be given to students, which may or may not contribute to the students' grades. By embedded, we mean that tests students take as part of their psychology curriculum will be used for assessment purposes, imposing no additional demands on students. Assessment criteria can be found in the new mission statement for the Psychology major:
http://www.csub.edu/psychology/mission.html
All Psychology students should know the goals and objectives listed in this mission statement. Familiarity with these goals and objectives can assist students in their personal, academic, and professional plans. Students will be informed of their roles and participation needs as this process gets underway.
           This class meets the following goals and objectives of Psychology:
           Goal 1 objective c / Goal 2 Objectives a-d / Goal 3 objectives c,e,f / Goal 4 objective a-d / Goal 5 objectives a, e
           see: http://www.csub.edu/psychology/mission.html

Gender Race and Ethnicity --- Assessment of Goals and Objectives

This course can satisfy your Gender, Race, and Ethnicity (GRE) requirement.  For fall quarter 2011, Goal 1 will be assessed in this class. The goals and objectives of the GRE requirement are:

 Goal 1. The course should have, as its principal focus, some aspect of the lives, roles, contributions, perspectives, and experiences of the particular group(s) discussed whether they be women or more specific ethnic and racial groups. Discussion of these groups needs to be set within a broadly defined context, one that might not be limited by national boundaries.

Objective a. Students taking the course should be able to demonstrate an understanding of the broad processes of multicultural/global issues related to issues of gender, race, and/or ethnicity.

            Assessment of this objective will occur in your exams.   

Objective b. Students taking the course should be able to compare and contrast issues of gender, race, and/or ethnicity across different cultures.
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your exams.

Goal 2. Relevant scholarship on the course topic, in historical context, should be an important part of course readings and discussions. Attention to past and present theoretical approaches should be incorporated into the course readings and discussions. 

Objective a. Students taking the course should be able to compare past and present discipline-specific theories related to gender, race and/or ethnicity.
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your exams.

Goal 3. The course should incorporate viewpoints of individuals whose lives may differ in terms of gender, race, and ethnicity.

Objective a. Students taking the course should be able to compare and contrast viewpoints of individuals whose lives differ in terms of gender, race, and/or ethnicity.
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your class paper.

Goal 4. The course should identify the structure and dynamics of domination and subordination. The course should include critical analyses of how cultural and societal assumptions about gender, race, and ethnicity function in individuals' lives.

Objective a. Students taking the course should be able to identify the structure and dynamics of domination and subordination in gender, race and/or ethnicity.  
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your exams.                                                                    

Objective b. Students taking the course should be able to analyze the ways in which cultural and societal assumptions about gender, race and/or ethnicity function in individual’s lives.
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your web-discussions/class blog.

Goal 5. The course should include the use of pedagogical techniques that encourage student participation, to enable them to be active learners and critical thinkers, and to examine their personal values.

Objective a. Students taking the course should be able to demonstrate critical thinking skills about issues of gender, race and/or ethnicity.               
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your Project and in your Media Project.                                                    

Objective b. Students taking the course should be able to identify how their personal values relate to and have changed regarding issues of gender, race and/or ethnicity.
            Assessment of this objective will occur in your web-discussions/class blog.

WRITING ASSISTANCE & RE-WRITES
The purpose of the following is not to discourage outside assistance, but to enable me to more accurately assess student writing. Outside writing assistance must be limited to identifying and drawing your attention to writing problems. You must do the actual corrections and revisions yourself. If you do obtain outside assistance for your writing, then you need to: (a) tell me and identify the source of help, (b) make sure that your tutor understands and agrees to the stated policy, and (c) hand in, along with your term paper, all of the written work that you showed to your writing tutor and any written feedback that he/she provided. Also, in papers I ask you to re-write, make sure to attached the original graded paper.

The university hosts a Writing Center, where you can go for assistance to help you improve your writing--THEY WILL NOT WRITE YOUR PAPERS. They are located in (Adminstration East) AE 101 (tel. 664-2086). Their page is located at: http://www.csub.edu/oasis

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT:

Students who are entitled to accommodations under the ADA can contact me at their earliest convenience to make appropriate arrangements. I adhere to all rules and regulations set forth by CSUB’s Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) office http://www.csub.edu/UnivServices/SSD/. (Tel. 654-3360)   

NOTE: The above schedule and procedures in this course are subject to change in the event of extenuating circumstances.