|
http://www.csub.edu/~lvega/. Office: DDH 111D (Tel. 654-3024) Office Hours: Mo 9:30 a.m.-12:15 p.m. We 10:00 a.m.-12:15 p.m., & by appointment |
Student TA Shamir G. Email: Hours:
|
COURSE DESCRIPTION
An in-depth analysis of theories and principles about
intergroup
relations,
with special attention given to the social psychology of minorities.
Topics
include an historical and comparative review of research and theory in
intergroup relations; current theory and research on social identity,
stereotypes,
attitudes; and applications of the literature to contemporary societal
problems. This class meets the Gender, Race, and Ethnicity requirement
for the 1997-2013 catalogs. Recommended: Psychology 312-Social
Psychology.
Note: This
is a seminar class, NOT a
lecture class, so come prepared to be involved in class discussions of
the readings.
COURSE
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this course is to introduce students to the
concepts
and tools necessary for the study of intergroup relations. To
successfully
complete this course, students must demonstrate competency in 12
objectives
that, if successfully met, will allow students to
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice (1st ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Publishing Company Inc.ELECTRONIC RESOURCES
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2001) Intergroup relations: Readings in social psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Postmes, T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Rediscovering Social Identity: Key Readings. New York: Psychology Press.
REQUIRED JOURNAL ARTICLES can be found at the
university's library system:
Boring, Edwin G.(1951). The woman problem. American Psychologist, 6, 679-682.
Eagly. A., & Eaton, A., rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysis
of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67, 211-230.
Eagly. A., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution
of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
46, 735-754.
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really
fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 11, 1139-1150.
Mohr, J. J.; & Fassinger, R. E. (2006). Sexual orientation identity and
romantic relationship quality in same-sex couples. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1085-1099.
Patterson, C. J. (2006). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 5, 241-244.
Tyler, T. R., & Barry, H. (2009). The other side of injustice: When unfair procedures
increase group-serving behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1026-1032.
Winerman, L. (2011, September). Closing the achievement gap: Could a 15-minute gap intervention boost
ethnic-minority student achievement? Monitor in Psychology, 42(8), 36-40.
(http://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/09/achievement.aspx)
Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of
self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction.Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 10, 109–120.
CLASS SCHEDULE
|
|
| Quizzes | |
| 9/10 M | A / H&A/ | Introduction- The Nature/Nurture
Debate of
Prejudice Readings: Preface of all books (Read H& A Appendix, p. 403) Boring, Edwin G.(1951). The woman problem. American Psychologist, 6, 679-682.<Link> |
------- |
| 9/12 W | A 1-8 (pp. 1-140) |
Psychology of the Outroup: Emergence and Maintenance Part i. preferential thinking 1. what is the problem? 2. the normality of prejudgment 3. formation of in-groups 4. rejection of out-groups 5. patterning and extent of prejudice part ii. group differences 6. the scientific study of group differences 7. racial and ethnic differences 8. visibility and strangeness article Winerman, L. (2011, September). Closing the achievement gap: Could a 15-minute gap intervention boostethnic-minority student achievement? Monitor in Psychology, 42(8), 36-40. <Link> |
------- |
| 9/17 M | A 9-16 (pp. 142-296) |
Psychology of Group
Differences: Value
of Markers 9. traits due to victimization part iii. perceiving and thinking about group differences 10. the cognitive process 11. linguistic factors 12. stereotypes in our culture 13. theories of prejudice part iv. sociocultural factors 14. social structure and cultural pattern 15. choice of scapegoats 16. the effect of contact |
Q1 |
| 9/19 W | A 17-24 (pp. 297-392) |
Situational Bases of Prejudice:
Learned or
Predisposed? part v. acquiring prejudice 17. conforming 18. the young child 19. later learning 20. inner conflict part vi. the dynamics of prejudice 21. frustration 22. aggression and hatred 23. anxiety, sex, guilt 24. projection articles Mohr, J. J.; & Fassinger, R. E. (2006). Sexual orientation identity andromantic relationship quality in same-sex couples. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 32, 1085-1099. Patterson, C. J. (2006). Children of lesbian and gay parents. Current Directionsin Psychological Science, 5, 241-244. |
Q2 |
| 9/24 M | A 25-31 (pp. 395-519) |
A Second Look at Prejudice:
Interventions--Successes--Failures part vii. character structure 25. the prejudiced personality 26. demagogy 27. the tolerant personality 28. religion and prejudice 30. evaluation of programs 31. limitations and horizons articles Eagly. A., & Eaton, A., rose, S. M., Riger, S., & McHugh, M. C. (2012). Feminism and psychology: Analysisof a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist, 67, 211-230. Eagly. A., & Steffen, V. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distributionof women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46, 735-754. |
Q3 |
| 9/26 W |
H & A |
EXAM
1 Intergroup relations overview |
------- |
| 10/1 M | H & A 1 | Personality and Indivividual
Differences (Proposal
1 Due) Pettigrew, T. (1959). Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 29-42. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. article Word, C. O., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation ofself-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction.Journal of ExperimentalSocial Psychology, 10, 109–120. |
Q4 |
| 10/3 W | H & A 2 | Goal relations and
interdependence Sherif, J. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 349-356. Bobo, L. and V. Hutchings. 1996. Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of Group Position in a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951-971. | Q5 |
| 10/8 M | H & A 3 | Social identity & group
identification Tajfel, H., & Turner, j. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & s.Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA; Brooks/Cole. Hogg, M., & Hains, S. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295-309. |
Q6 |
| 10/10 W | H & A 4 | Intergroup attitudes &
explanations
Tajfel, H. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In J.C. Turner, & H. Giles (Eds.). Intergroup behavior (pp. 144-167). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. Dovidio, J., & Gaertner, S., 1996. Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 51-75. Pettigrew, T. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476. |
Q7 |
| 10/15 M | H & A 5 | Intergroup behavior & discrimination Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102. Otten, S., Mummendey, A., & Blanz, J. (1996). Intergroup discrimination in positive and gegative outcome allocations: Impact of stimulus valence, relative group status, and relative group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 568-581. Tyler, T., deGoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psycholocgical dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930. |
Q8 |
| 10/17 W | H & A 6 | Motives for group
membership/behavior Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482 Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity in a changing context: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243-251 |
Q9 |
| 10/22 M | H & A 7 |
Influence in intergroup context Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119. Moscovici, S. & Personnaz., B. (1980). Minority influence and conversion behavior in a perceptual task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 270-282. |
Q10 |
| 10/24 W | H & A 8 | Disadvantage & relative
deprivation (Media Project Due) Reicher, S. D. (1984), The St. Pauls’ riot: An explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 1-21. Vanneman R. D., & Pettigrew T. F. ( 1972). Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461-486. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003. |
Q11 |
| 10/29 M | H & A 9 | Contact & social
harmony Gaertner, S. L. , Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 239-249. Wilder, D. A. (1984). Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 177-194. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710 |
Q12 |
| 10/31 W | |
article Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes reallyfading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 11, 1139-1150. (EXAM 2)--last hour |
------- |
| 11/5 M | P & B |
(Class Paper Proposal Due) Part 1. Social Identity Introduction. T. Postmes, N.R. Branscombe, Sources of Social Identity. J.C. Turner, K.J. Reynolds, The Story of Social Identity. Tajfel's Vision for a Social Psychology. H. Tajfel, Experiments in a Vacuum. H. Tajfel, Individuals and Groups in Social Psychology. |
Q13 |
| 11/7 W | P & B | (Class Paper Due) Part 2. The Development of Social Identity Theory. H. Tajfel, Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour. H. Tajfel, Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup Behaviour. H. Tajfel, Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison. H. Tajfel, The Achievement of Group Differentiation. H. Tajfel, The Social Psychology of Minorities. H. Tajfel, J.C. Turner, An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. H. Tajfel, Social Stereotypes and Social Groups. | Q14 |
| 11/12 M | P & B | HOLIDAY – Veterans Day Observed – Campus Closed Part 3. Conceptual and Meta-theoretical Foundations of Self-categorization Theory. J.C. Turner, Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. J.C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, The Significance of the Social Identity Concept for Social Psychology with Reference to Individualism, Interactionism and Social Influence. |
Q15 |
| 11/14 M |
P & B | Part 4. Development and Elaboration of Self-categorization Theory. J.C. Turner, Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. J.C. Turner, The Analysis of Social Influence. J.C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, S.A. Haslam, C. McGarty, Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context. J.C. Turner, P.J. Oakes, The Socially Structured Mind. J.C. Turner, R.S. Onorato, Social Identity, Personality, and the Self-Concept: A Self-Categorization Perspective. | Q16 |
| 11/19 M | P & B | Part 5. Conclusions. S.A. Haslam, N. Ellemers, S.D. Reicher, K.J. Reynolds, M.T. Schmitt, The Social Identity Perspective Today: The Impact of Its Defining Ideas. S.A. Haslam, N. Ellemers, S.D. Reicher, K.J. Reynolds, M.T. Schmitt, The Social Identity Perspective Tomorrow: Opportunities and Avenues for Advance. article Tyler, T. R., & Barry, H. (2009). The other side of injustice: When unfair proceduresincrease group-serving behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1026-1032. |
Q17 |
| 11/26 M | -Final | EXAM III (2:00 p.m. -- 4:30 p.m.) |
GRADING
| 17 Quizzes Test 1 Test 2 Media Project Class Paper Chatroom Participation --3 class blog discussions Final-Test 3 TOTAL |
85
50
50
50
70
15 80 400 |
| A = 92-100% | B- = 80-81.9% | D+ = 68-69.9% |
| A- = 90-91.9% | C+ = 78-79.9% | D = 62-67.9% |
| B+ = 88-89.9% | C = 72-77.9% | D- = 60-61.9% |
| B = 82-87.9% | C- = 70-71.9% | F = 0-59.9% |
TESTS 1 & 2: Tests will consist of class readings and discussions. Multiple choice, fill in the answer, and essay questions will comprise the tests (50 points each).
MEDIA PROJECT With the technological changes we are witnessing, more than ever it is important to have tech-literacy. In this class you will have the choice of creating an enhanced (a) Powerpoint presentation, a (b) webpage with mulitple levels or frames, or (c) a short video-documentary. These media projects will be required in this class for each student, in lieu of individual presentations--given the large size of this class. The topic of this project will be applying social psychology to an intergroup issue, such as reducing prejudice/discrimination of a target group, improving positive intergroup behavior, or any other topic that is of interest to you in the social psychology of intergroup relations. The goal is to be informative,demonstrate knowledge from this course, and use research-based evidence. Possible groups you may use in this assignment include:
|
|
|
|
The media project must:
CLASS PAPER:
For this paper you will
do
a formal research paper using a top-bottom approach.
Specifically,
you will pick any of the theories we discuss in class, and then you
will
examine the literature to see how well the theory's predictions (top)
receive
support in the literature (bottom). Although you can use some of the
articles
we will be reading for class, you will also need to use an additional ten
articles published in the last two years. If you like, you can based
your
writing in the same problem area you chose for your webpage, but keep the
emphasis
unique to each assignment (75 points). Due date listed in class
schedule.
(Paper
proposal is optional)
EVALUATION Criteria for course papers:
| summarize
evaluate contrast |
explain describe define |
compare discuss criticize |
justify trace interpret |
prove illustrate analyze |
CHATROOM PARTICIPATION -- Chatrooms will be created in Blackboard for student discussion and contributions. The chatrooms will be divided by (a) reactions to class readigns, (b) class material in the news, (c) blogging on topics from class, and (d) increasing intergroup harmony. Student participation is required in all four chatrooms, with 15 points allocated to these activities. Grades on these activities will be based on a 1-page summary that each student will write documenting participation. More instructions will be given in class (due on the last day of classes).
FINAL EXAM -- The final exam will be comprehensive and based on class materials, class discussions, and class papers. Multiple choice, fill in the answer, and essay questions will comprise the final (80 points).
GENERAL INFORMATIONThis course can satisfy
your Gender, Race, and Ethnicity (GRE) requirement. For fall quarter 2011, Goal 1 will be assessed in this class. The goals and
objectives of the GRE requirement are:
Goal 1. The course
should have, as its principal focus, some aspect of the lives, roles,
contributions, perspectives, and experiences of the particular group(s)
discussed whether they be women or more specific ethnic and racial groups.
Discussion of these groups needs to be set within a broadly defined context,
one that might not be limited by national boundaries.
Objective a. Students taking the course should be able to demonstrate an understanding of the broad processes of multicultural/global issues related to issues of gender, race, and/or ethnicity.
Assessment of this objective will occur in
your exams.
Objective
b. Students taking the course should be able to compare and contrast
issues of gender, race, and/or ethnicity across different cultures.
Assessment of this objective will occur in
your exams.
Goal 2. Relevant scholarship on the course topic, in historical context,
should be an important part of course readings and discussions. Attention to
past and present theoretical approaches should be incorporated into the course
readings and discussions.
Objective a. Students taking the
course should be able to compare past and present discipline-specific theories
related to gender, race and/or ethnicity.
Assessment
of this objective will occur in your exams.
Goal 3. The course should
incorporate viewpoints of individuals whose lives may differ in terms of
gender, race, and ethnicity.
Objective a. Students taking the
course should be able to compare and contrast viewpoints of individuals whose
lives differ in terms of gender, race, and/or ethnicity.
Assessment
of this objective will occur in your class paper.
Goal 4. The course should identify
the structure and dynamics of domination and subordination. The course should
include critical analyses of how cultural and societal assumptions about
gender, race, and ethnicity function in individuals' lives.
Objective a. Students taking the
course should be able to identify the structure and dynamics of domination and
subordination in gender, race and/or ethnicity.
Assessment
of this objective will occur in your exams.
Objective b. Students taking the
course should be able to analyze the ways in which cultural and societal
assumptions about gender, race and/or ethnicity function in individual’s lives.
Assessment
of this objective will occur in your web-discussions/class blog.
Goal 5. The course should include
the use of pedagogical techniques that encourage student participation, to
enable them to be active learners and critical thinkers, and to examine their
personal values.
Objective a. Students taking the
course should be able to demonstrate critical thinking skills about issues of
gender, race and/or ethnicity.
Assessment
of this objective will occur in your Project and in your Media Project.
Objective b. Students taking the
course should be able to identify how their personal values relate to and have
changed regarding issues of gender, race and/or ethnicity.
Assessment
of this objective will occur in your web-discussions/class blog.
WRITING
ASSISTANCE & RE-WRITES
The purpose of the following is not to discourage outside
assistance,
but to enable me to more accurately assess student writing. Outside
writing
assistance must be limited to identifying and drawing your attention to
writing problems. You must do the actual corrections and revisions
yourself.
If you do obtain outside assistance for your writing, then you need to:
(a) tell me and identify the source of help, (b) make sure that your
tutor
understands and agrees to the stated policy, and (c) hand in, along
with
your term paper, all of the written work that you showed to your
writing
tutor and any written feedback that he/she provided. Also, in papers I
ask you to re-write, make sure to attached the original graded paper.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT:
Students
who are entitled to accommodations under the
NOTE: The above schedule and procedures in this course are subject to change in the event of extenuating circumstances.