http://www.csub.edu/~lvega/312sylwin13.html
SYLLABUS
PSYCHOLOGY 312: Social Psychology
(CRN=10192 Sec.1) Winter 2013 - -Main Campus
Tue & Thurs. 10:00 a.m. -- 12:05 p.m. (DDH 104K)
INSTRUCTOR
Luis A. Vega, Ph.D.lvega@csub.edu.http://www.csub.edu/~lvega/.
Office: DDH 111D (Tel. 654-3024)
Office Hours: Monday 9:30 a.m.- 12:15 p.m.;
Wed. 10:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. & by appointment.
|
TEACHING ASSISTANTS
Student TA
Ms Ariba Khizer
Mr. Kevin Miller
Hours: TBA
|
Note: We will make intensive use of the class
homepage and Blackboard(http://www.csub.edu/els/bb9/).
Instructions
will be provided in class.
COURSE
DESCRIPTION
Examination of theory and research concerning group affiliation,
group standards, social perception, reference groups, and other social
influences on the behavior of individuals. Topics include: the self and
society, attitudes and attitude change, social perception, attraction
and love, aggression and violence, and group
dynamics. Lecture/discussion. Prerequisite: Completion of General Education Areas A, B4, and D--note,
these prerequisites apply if you are taking this class for the GE Theme
3 requirement--you must also be junior status (90 units completed). IF
you are using this course for either the major or a minor, the only
prerequisite is one course in psychology (see catalog http://www.csub.edu/catalog/2011-2013_regularlyUpdated/pages/012.pdf).
COURSE
OBJECTIVES After
completing
this course, students shall
- Recognize, describe, evaluate, and constructively criticize
evidence
presented
to explain social influence phenomena in social psychological areas
covered
in this class (see the class schedule below).
- Name important classic studies in social psychology
by
identifying
researcher and study findings.
- Identify major parts of a published empirical research paper,
critically
evaluating three aspects of its content.
- Identify and discuss theory, methodology, and conceptual
evidence
in
support
(or against) social psychological findings.
- Identify and evaluate social psychological hypotheses of
social
psychological
phenomena.
- Evaluate alternative explanations of social psychological
findings.
- Use social psychological arguments in a cogent and logical
fashion in
explaining
social behavior.
- Use the empirical literature to develop a social
psychological
topic,
critically
evaluating the evidence in support (or against) of the social influence
phenomena under discussion.
- Describe strengths and weaknesses in terms of validity of the
conclusions
for social psychological findings.
- Write reports using correct (APA or MLA) style and correct
English
grammar,
mechanics, and syntax.
- [Please See
Outcomes
Assessment Section Below for More Information]
TEXTS for
this course can be found at the
university
bookstore: REQUIRED
Duff, K. J. (2012). Think social psychology. Boston: Pearson.
(buying ebook)
Clavell, J. (1993). The art of war: By
Sun Tzu. New York:
Delta.
Cialdini, R. B. (1983). Influence: The psychology of
persuasion (3rd, Rev. ed.). New York: William Morrow.
READINDGS for
this course can be found at the
university's library system: REQUIRED
(see class schedule for due dates)
Packer, D. J. (2008). Identifying systematic disobedience in Milgram’s obedience experiments: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 301-304.
Tierney, J. (2008, April 8). And behind door no. 1, a fatal flaw. New York Times.
Van Lange, P. A. M. & Joireman, J. A. (2008). How can we promote behaviour that serves all of us in the future. Social Issue and Policy Review, 2, 127-157.
Ward,
A., & Brenner, L. (2006). Accentuate the negative: The positive
effects of negative acknowledgment. When questions change behavior. Psychological Science, 17, 959-962.
WEB RESOURCES
- Writing_the
Research Report -- http://methods.fullerton.edu/appa.html
- Psych_Web
Resources (Russ Dewey) --http://www.psychwww.com/
- Elements_of
Style (Strunk &
White) --http://www.bartleby.com/141/index.html
- American_Psychological
Assoc. --http://www.apa.org/
- American_Psychological
Society --http://www.psychologicalscience.org
- Western_Psychological
Association --http://www.westernpsych.org
- Social_Psychology Network --http://www.socialpsychology.org/
- Classics in the History of
Psychology --http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/
- Encyclopedia of
Psychology --http://www.psychology.org
- APA style--worth browsing --http://www.apastyle.org
- English writing tutorials --http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
- Methods' Descriptions --http://www.slais.ubc.ca/resources/research_methods/
- Classbook Practice Quizzes --http://cengage.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLASS SCHEDULE --please
note deadlines for assignments
Winter 2012 Calendar
& Dates to
Remember Link> http://www.csub.edu/facultyaffairs/files/calendar/AcademicCalendar2011.pdf
| DATE |
READINGS |
TOPIC |
ASSIGNMENTS DUE |
1/8 T
|
Duff 1;
Cialdini 1** |
Introduction CHAPER1.pdf --free
|
---------------------------------- |
1/10 R
|
Duff 2; Cialdini 2 |
Theory in Soc Psy |
Cialdini 1 Due;Presentations
Start |
1/15 T
|
Cialdini 3; |
Methods in Soc
Psy |
Cialdini 2 Due; |
1/17 R
|
Duff 3;Ward & Brenner |
Social Cognition |
Cialdini 3 Due; |
1/22 T
|
Duff 4; Cialdini 4 |
The Self |
Cialdini 4 Due; SM Scale |
1/24 R
|
Cialdini 5 |
EXAM 1 |
---------------------------------- |
1/29 T
|
Duff 5; Cialdini 6; |
Social Perception (nonverbal video) |
Cialdini 5 Due |
| 1/31 R |
Duff 6.; Tierney |
Attitudes
|
Cialdini 6 Due; Paper Proposal 1 Due
|
2/5 T
|
Cialdini 7 |
Cognitive Dissonance and Alternatives
|
Cialdini 7 Due; |
2/7 R
|
Duff 7; Packer |
Persuasion |
Paper 1 Due |
2/12 T
|
Duff 8; |
Conformity / Obedience |
Asch/Milgram Films |
| 2/14 R |
Duff 9; Clavell 1-13;
|
Groups are Good/Bad
|
---------------------------------- |
2/19 T
|
|
EXAM II |
---------------------------------- |
2/21 R
|
Duff 10; |
Prejudice(Class divided film)
|
"Class divided
film" |
2/26 T
|
Duff 11 |
Aggression & Psy of Good and Evil
|
---------------------------------- |
2/28 R
|
Rhetoric
Book I |
Social Reality, Construal, and Belief |
Rhetoric
Test 1 |
3/5 T
|
Duff 12; Rhetoric II |
Attraction & Intimacy |
Paper 2 Due; Rhetoric
Test 2 |
|
3/7 R
|
Duff 13; Rhetoric III |
Altruism
|
Rhetoric
Test 3 |
3/12 T
|
Van Lange |
Soc Psy Applications |
---------------------------------- |
| 3/14 R |
Advance Topics
|
Advance topics
|
---------------------------------- |
3/22 F
|
FINAL |
EXAM III (11:00 a.m.-1:30 p.m.) |
---------------------------------- |
GRADING
(TESTS will include both
objective
and essay components)
2 Tests (Readings
& Lecture)
Final Test
7 Assignments (Cialdini) (5 pts each)
Presentation
Paper 1
Paper 2
Aristotle's Rhetoric (10 pts
each)
TOTAL |
120
70
35
15
35
45
30
350
|
| A =
92-100% |
B- =
80-81.9% |
D+ =
68-69.9% |
| A- =
90-91.9% |
C+ =
78-79.9% |
D =
62-67.9% |
| B+ =
88-89.9% |
C =
72-77.9% |
D- =
60-61.9% |
| B =
82-87.9% |
C- =
70-71.9% |
F =
0-59.9% |
PRESENTATIONS
Each student in class will give a presentation on a chosen
set of
readings.
The presentation can be based on Cialdini, Duff, or
Clavell's
books. If you chose Cialdini, you should pick a concept from one of the
chapters. The students are first to explain the concept; and second,
they
are to apply it to an example of their personal experience. Those
students
who chose Duff or Clavell's books should also pick a concept
from
one of the chapters. These are very brief presentations (lasting a few
minutes), to be given at the beginning of each class. The presentation
will be worth 15 points (which could make
the
difference between an "A" or a "B"). Grades for the presentation will
be
assigned as follows: A "C" is for an adequate presentation of the
concepts,
but one that does not go beyond the treatment of the text. A "B" is for
effective description of concepts and reasonable applications. An "A"
is
for effective presentations that go beyond the text, and a presentation
style that is effective. An outline of your presentation should be
turned
in to the instructor. More details will be giving during class. (Note:
Failure to present will result in an "F").
PAPER 1
Once you read Cialdini's book, you will discover that social
influence
is a constant state of war, with few defenses to the unsuspecting
targets,
against an army full of weaponry--the profiteers. The profiteers attack
the targets' "thoughts, emotions, and behaviors," and the profiteers
are
so effective that their presence can be "imagined, implied, or actual"
(Allport, 1954). The Clavell (1983) book summarizes Sun Tzu's Art
of
war book, which describes how psychological warfare
effectively
involves weapons of social influence. Pick an issue that is of importance to you and coalesce, synthesize,
summarize
evaluate
contrast |
explain
describe
define |
compare
discuss
criticize |
justify
trace
interpret |
prove
illustrate
analyze |
source: Moss,
A., &
Holder,
C. (1988, p. 18). Improving student writing: A guidebook for
faculty
in all disciplines. Dubuque, IW: Kendall/Hunt Publishing
Company.
and/or
integrate Cialdini and Clavell's books to show how both books can
explain
how profiteers wage war against innocent targets (i.e., the cognitive
misers; note, you can also incorporate Duff's book).
To complete this assignment,
- Read the Clavell and Cialdini's books and write
a four
to six
page paper where you discuss examples from the books on how our
thoughts,
emotions, and behaviors are influenced by profiteers and society
(others'
presence--be implied, imagined, or actual)--that is, how have you used,
or have others used on you, principles from Sun Tzu to achieve social
influence goals.
- Support your
analysis of the
Clavell book by
using Cialdini and Myers's books--that is, for each principle from Sun
Tzu, show how it is supported by principles from Cialini or Duff's
books.
- State the purpose of the paper, provide supporting evidence
by
using
examples
from the reading, and draw reasonable conclusions supported by your
evidence--that is, present a coherent story, not a laundry list of principles--use good flow.
- Integrate class material and demonstrate that you are
learning
core
concepts
from this class. Be strategic in how you write this paper, maintaining
flow and coherence. Due date listed in class
schedule.
PAPER 2
Write a seven to 10 page paper in an area of social
psychology that
is of interest to you. This is an applications paper, meaning that you
should apply the concepts that you are learning in this class. In
addition,
it is required that you use a minimum of TEN references in the paper.
Your
sources should be professional journals articles or book chapters (no
popular
magazines or internet sources). Use your text, psychological abstracts
(i.e., PsychInfo/EBSCohost), the computer search index, and the
reference list of
the latest journal articles to locate sources (Note: you may
be
asked to turn in your sources along with your paper and/or I may
want to see the notes you took in reviewing your sources for this
paper).
Possible topics for this paper include but shall not be limited to
- (from previous classes)
- How to Get Your Child to Have High Academic Ambitions
- How My Boss Can Run the Business More Efficiently
- How to have a Peaceful Relationship with my Mother in Law
- How to Crush the Junk Food Habit
- Steps to get that Job in this Competitive Economy
- Conforming to Obedience Creates Better, Stronger Soldiers
- The Art of and Manipulation of Car Salesmanship Using Social Psychology Principles
- Getting more than one date with that special one
- How to Maintain an Orderly Classroom and Increase the Confidence in the Students
- The Art Of Sorority War
You may want to consider other topics, for which I will give
you
feedback
in your paper proposals (optional)..
STEPS to follow to successfully complete this
project:
- Precisely define the topic/problem area you are
writing about.
- Carefully select the sources you will need to answer the
question(s)
posed
by your topic.
- Submit your project proposal to me for approval (note: this
proposal
should
be attached to your final paper).
- Summarize, synthesize, and integrate your sources as they
relate
to
your
problem area (no laundry lists).
- Apply the principles/findings of the literature to your
problem.
NOTE: I prefer you use American
Psychological Association (APA)
(Sixth Edition) guidelines in writing the papers, though this is not
required
as this class attracts students from different disciplines. However, I
do expect formal college writing in both papers. Sample papers will be
posted on the class webpage. Also, if you are not sure on how to do a
literature
search at CSUB, I recommend that you see me early in the quarter to
help
you get assistance. Due date listed
in class
schedule.
EVALUATION
CRITERIA--a rubric will be provided in class, which will include the following elements:
- Defining an appropriate, limited topic.
- Selection and description of appropriate literature.
- Reasonable application of psychological principles.
- Thoughtful discussion of implications of the research.
- Writing (e.g., grammar, syntax, style, etc.).
- Quality rather than quantity.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSALS
for the class paper should
include
the following information: 1) Proposal #. 2) Your name. 3) Problem or
question
to be researched. 4) Principles you will use to answer your question.
5)
Reasons for selecting topic. 6) Tentative sources. 7) Tentative outline
of paper. Note, proposals are optional and designed to provide preliminary feedback on your topic if you need assistance.
RHETORIC BY
ARISTOTLE
As an early social psychologist writer, Aristotle put
forward
many principles of social influence in his influential writings found
in Rhetoric.
In this class,
you will have the privilege
of
reading this early classic. You will have a choice to take one test
worth 30 points, which will include materials from all three books from
rhetoric;
alternatively, you
can chose to have three tests, each worth 10 points after you read
each book. We will all decide as a class which test format to select.
The full reference for this source is
Aristotle (350 B.C.E.). Rhetoric
(translated by W. Rhys
Roberts). Retrieved on September 14, 2009,
from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/rhetoric.html
or http://www.molloy.edu/sophia/aristotle/rhetoric/rhetc_main.htm
OUTOCOMES
ASSESSMENT
Higher education "shareholders" increasingly
demand high
leverage for every dollar spent in our universities. As such, teaching
and learning accountability is demanded in demonstrable terms for both
professors and students. How well teaching (professors) and
learning (students) goals and objectives are being met is imperative for a quality education.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) in Psychology:
All students taking psychology courses can be expected to
be part of the outcomes assessment process, either through direct or
embedded means. By direct, we mean that specific assessment tests will
be given to students, which may or may not contribute to the students'
grades. By embedded, we mean that tests students take as part of their
psychology curriculum will be used for assessment purposes, imposing no
additional demands on students. Assessment criteria can be found in the mission statement for the Psychology major,
http://www.csub.edu/psychology/mission.html.
The Department of Psychology, by agreement of the professors who teach this course, have determine that
MASTERY level knowledge in the following student learning objectives is expected in students who take this class:
Goal 1: Knowledge Base of Psychology /
Outcome 1.3: Use the concepts, language, and major theories of the discipline to account for psychological phenomena.
Goal 2: Research Methods in Psychology /
Outcome 2.1: Describe the basic characteristics of the science of psychology.
Goal 3: Critical Thinking Skills in Psychology /
Outcome 3.3: Use reasoning to recognize, develop, defend, and criticize arguments and other persuasive appeals.
Goal 4:
Application of
Psychology
/
Outcome 4.4: Apply psychological concepts, theories, and research findings as these relate to everyday life.
Goal 5:
Values in
Psychology
/
Outcome 5.4: Tolerate ambiguity and realize that psychological explanations are often complex and tentative.
Assessment: All these SLO will be assessed through embedded assessment as part of class test, papers, or surveys.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) in Theme 3 General Education:
Because this course carries credit in
Theme 3 courses for General Education, the professor and students are
responsible for meeting the following Theme 3 SLOs in this course:
Goal of Theme 3 Courses: Use
social/behavioral science methods and principles to understand the
social world of the United States and the world beyond its borders.
Objective 1: Distinguish
social/behavioral science methodologies from non-social scientific ways
of knowing and understanding the social world.
Objective 2: Demonstrate knowledge of the basic terms, concepts, and presuppositions of a specific social/behavioral science.
Objective 3: Apply
social/behavioral science methods and principles to understand
significant Global and American economic, cultural, political, and
social phenomena and trends.
Assessment: All these SLOs will
be assessed through the main class paper, where instructions will be
provided in content, format, and specific questions to be answered for
each learning objective.
WRITING
ASSISTANCE & RE-WRITES
The purpose of the following is not
to discourage outside assistance, but to enable me to more accurately assess
student writing. Outside writing assistance must be limited to identifying and
drawing your attention to writing problems. You must do the actual corrections
and revisions yourself. If you do obtain outside assistance for your writing,
then you need to: (a) tell me and identify the source of help, (b) make sure
that your tutor understands and agrees to the stated policy, and (c) hand in,
along with your term paper, all of the written work that you showed to your
writing tutor and any written feedback that he/she provided. Also, in papers I
ask you to re-write, make sure to attach the original graded paper.
The university hosts a Writing Center, where you can go for assistance to help you improve your writing--THEY WILL NOT WRITE
YOUR PAPERS. They are located in (Administration East) AE 105 (tel. 654-6411--email:
oaistutoring@csub.edu. Their page is located at: http://www.csub.edu/oasis/
AMERICANS
WITH DISABILITIES ACT:
Students who are entitled to
accommodations under the ADA can contact me at their earliest convenience to
make appropriate arrangements. I adhere to all rules and regulations set forth
by CSUB’s Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) office http://www.csub.edu/UnivServices/SSD/. (Tel.
654-3360) .
GENERAL INFORMATION
- Per the CSUB University Catalog and pursuant to Title
5, California Code of Regulations, § 41301. Standards for Student Conduct,
CSUB students must adhere to laws, rules, standards, responsibilities, and
expectations inherent with being a CSUB student. Specifically, acts of
student misconduct such as academic dishonesty, interference with
instructional activities, activities endangering the well being of the
university community, as well as criminal activity of any kind will result
in disciplinary actions, including expulsion and/or referral/involvement of
local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies (see p. 90-91 of the
2011/13 catalog ---http://www.csub.edu/catalog/2011-2013_regularlyUpdated/pages/012.pdf).
- Make-up exams are given only in the event of medical
emergencies.
- Late papers or assignments will NOT be accepted.
**CIALDINI ASSIGNMENTS
NOTE: Be sure to define
terms in your answers (e.g.,
"perceptual-contrast").
Also, make sure to underline or italicize important concepts in
your answers
and to use one example from the readings for each answer.
(Sample answers: http://www.csub.edu/%7Elvega/cialdini.html)
CIALDINI -- CHAPTER 1.
1. Explain how "Click, Whir" effects can contribute to falling out of love with a significant other.
2. Provide an example where "mimic" behaviors such as
found in the animal kingdom can overcome a bad first impression.
3. Explain how the "perceptual-contrast" effect polarizes
your appreciation of your significant other (or someone you like).
CIALDINI -- CHAPTER 2.
1. What seven conditions make the reciprocity rule universal? How are stereotypes involved?
2. Cialdini said, "A free gift carries a hidden cost." What is the cost (or costs)?
3. How is classical conditioning involved in the "rejection-then-retreat" tactic? Explain.
CIALDINI -- CHAPTER 3.
1. Using the principles of this chapter, what steps would you take to be the ideal person you want to be?
2. How could we use the principles of commitment and
consistency to help your subordinates successfully complete their
assigned tasks?
3. How would you use principles in this chapter to stop
the bad behavior of "Cheating Charlie" or "Liberated Lena," with whom
you are madly in love?
CIALDINI -- CHAPTER 4.
1. Discuss how you would use the social proof principle to
get people to see through the lies that politicians smear against each
other.
2. How would you apply the social proof principle to increase the use of green energy?
3. Use your knowledge of the social proof principle to explain how humans define "reality."
CIALDINI -- CHAPTER 5.
1. "I don't like you . . . " is likely to produce what types of responses? Why?
2. Based on what you know about the liking principle, what five steps could you take to be popular and admired?
3. Discuss and explain that principles that might apply in
the opposite of liking (say, hate). Use evidence from this
chapter.
CIALDINI - CHAPTER 6.
1. Discuss at least one authority rule, role, and symbol
that can increase obedience. Provide reasons why they work.
2. What types of authority tactics do "machiavellians" use
on their unsuspecting targets? (do research on the Prince)
3. What types of authority tactics do "demagogues" use on their unsuspecting targets?
CIALDINI -- CHAPTER 7.
1. Explain the emotions produced by the scarcity
principle. How are these emotions linked to relative value and desire
for that we lack?
2. How are "love games" explain by the scarcity principle? Explain.
3. Provide three tactics to combat psychological reactance--use evidence from the book.
WRITING
TIPSHere is a list of possible problems you will want to avoid.
(This
is
not a comprehensive list.)
- "CSUB students are the most loquacious, laboriously inclined,
and dispassionate cognitive-processors I have ever met." Vega (2011, p.
3) == Vega (2011) has high regard for CSUB students. Please avoid long quotes
in your writing which only show to me you are not thinking about what
you are reading. Summarize, paraphrase, or re-state your sources'
ideas. Only quote if it cannot be stated any better.
- Gang Violence | Paper 1 | Aggression | Discrimination Against Women: All these are not appropriate titles for class papers. Titles of papers should explicitly state the thesis of what you writing will cover.
- U.S.A. | CSUB | etc. | Aren't we in agreement? Acronyms must be spell out in first use and contractions are to be avoided in formal writing.
- Arizona State University professor, Robert Cialdini (1993) wrote a book titled Influence, which
explains how six universal principles of compliance work. ----- Please
pay attention to over-striked text, as it is not needed. No need for
university affiliation or title of book--that is the reason for a references page. Note,
in this class a references page is required--sources to be listed are
those you actually use. I will not accept a "works consulted,"
"bibliography," or "works cited" page.
The following are mistakes I frequently find in students' papers.
(adapted
from Allen, 1995).
Wrong: I feel that smaller doses should be
used. (To feel
something
is to sense it)
Correct: I believe
that smaller doses
should be used.
Wrong: The parent was effected by the child's
behavior.
Correct: The parent was affected
by
the child's behavior. (To affect is to influence)
Wrong: The affect of the noise was hearing loss.
(An affect
refers to an emotional state)
Correct: The effect
of the noise was
hearing loss. (An effect is something that has been caused)
Wrong: Johnson's (1992) results concluded that ... (Results cannot
conclude, only people can)
Correct: Johnson (1992)
concluded that....
Wrong: While I agree with their perspective, I feel
that ...
(While and since refer to time)
Correct: Although
I agree with their
perspective, I believe that ...
Wrong: The man refused since he disliked the
questions. (Since
refers to time)
Correct: The man refused because
he
disliked the questions.
Wrong: Among the two choices, I prefer the round
one. (Use
among
for 3 or more choices)
Correct: Between
the two choices, I
prefer the round one.
Wrong: Its the answer to it's
own question. (It's = It
is)
Correct: It is
the answer to its
own question.
Wrong: Their taking they're
test in the other room.
Correct: They are
taking their
test in the other room.
Wrong: Social psychological principals are useful.
(Noun=head
of a school; Adj=most important)
Correct: Social psychological principles
are useful. (Basic rule or law)
Wrong: The evidence proves my point. (Very few
things are ever
proven)
Correct: The evidence supports
my
point.
Wrong: The data is very convincing. (Data is a
plural word)
Correct: The data are
convincing.
** Avoid excessive and very needless
words when
you write = Avoid needless words **
For additional help, consult Strunk and White's (1979) book on Elements
of style (3rd ed). Also at: http://www.bartleby.com/141/index.html
for an electronic, free copy.
NOTE: The above schedule and
procedures
in this course are subject to change in the event of extenuating circumstances.