Soc 453: Vision and Method in Historical Society
Spring 2013                     
Dr. Gonzalo Santos
Instructor: Dr. Gonzalo Santos
email
Santos_Class@csub.edu
Office: DDH-AA205     Phone: 654-2191
Office Hours: 12:15pm - 2:00pm, Tu. & Th.

Teaching Assistant: Ms. Eva Rafik
email
evarafik@yahoo.com
Office: DDH-AA204
Office Hours: by appointment only

Course articles & activities placed at CSUB's Blackboard testing site at:

Textbooks:
* Theda Skocpol, Ed., 1984. Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521297240.
* Giovanni Arrighi, Beverly J. Silver, Eds., 1999. Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN: 9780816631520.

* Articles placed on Blackboard for Friday assignments.
Course Content & Structure:
Course Content: The course explores the theoretical vision and methodological approaches and techniques used by a variety of nineteenth- and twentieth-century scholars working at the intersections of social theory and history, viewed on a grand scale. We examine the research agendas that they followed, the basic theoretical assumptions they made about the nature, dynamics, and direction of society and history, and how these assumptions informed the questions they asked and the kinds of answers they offered. Specifically, we seek to understand how these scholars used various sources of evidence and ways of thinking about the past to define periods & eras, to pursue case studies or comparisons between social groups, nations, or world systems & civilizations. In the course of exploring the vision & method of renowned historical social scientists, students will be exposed to a variety of social, economic, political, and cultural topics, historically grounded and theoretically informed, typically at the macro level.

Course Format: The course has a "hybrid" format, and as such, has three components: (1) Lecture sessions, on Mondays & Wednesdays, from 10:00 am to 11:15 am, at BDC 264B; (2) Laboratory sessions, on Monday & Wednesdays, from 11:15 am to 12:30 pm, at WS Library Cmptr Lab 14; and (3) Reading & writing activities, on Fridays, independently done by each student, for one hour and a quarter - anytime before Friday midnight.

(1) The lecture sessions follow two stages, in sequence: Firstly, we will analyze and evaluate the theoretical framework, research designs and methods used by ten well-known contemporary historical social scientists in their most important works, following the Skocpol book. Then we will take an in-depth look at the vision and method of a single great work of historical social science, the prescient collaborative effort embodied in the 1999 Arrighi & Silver book -- written after the end of the Cold War and the First Gulf War, but before the 9/11/2001 terrorist attacks in Washington, the U.S. wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, and the 2008 U.S. financial meltdown. Fully vindicated by events since its publishing, it is a classic example of how theorizing history can help explain the present and anticipate the future of our social world.

(2) The lab sessions will be the proactive research and writing component for the students, based on the reading assigned for the lecture on the same day. To that effect, students should come to class with a DRAFT TEXT already prepared - saved in Word in a USB-thumb drive - of what they got out of the assigned reading for that day following this loose template: a) What is the reading's subject matter all about? b) What is the main theoretical perspective or claim of the author? c) What is the main methodological approach or techniques used by the author? What are some of the key historical and sociological findings, and how well does the author explains them? d) What are some of the strengths and criticisms that may leveled against the author's vision & method? e) Where else could you fruitfully apply the author's vision and method?

Students should take notes during the class lecture & discussion, and then, during the lab session following, INCORPORATE as the new insights into the draft text, research and add further using the internet, and when you are done, upload your LAB JOURNAL entry for that day. The lab journal function in Blackboard will be accessible after 11:00am and before 12:45pm on each day there is a lab. Drafts should be at least one page long and final journal entries should be at least 3 pages long - double spaced in normal font 12. Do not attach or paste the initial drafts onto Blackboard, rather work in Word first. When you are done, the final journal entries can be attached as a Word file (named with your last name and the date; e.g. "Smith 4-15-13.docx") or copy/pasted into the text field in Blackboard (in the latter case, do not worry about any formatting problem that arises). Save everything.

Of course, none of this makes any sense unless students arrive to the lectures & labs having already read the assigned reading for each session and prepared a draft journal entry. No lab journal entries can be entered from outside the computer lab (students must be present in the lab) or outside it's time frame - no late entries will be allowed. Dr. Santos will be available at the lab to consult with students.

Lab Journals will be graded for organization, clarity, analytical depth & factual accuracy, length & analytical breath, and critical thinking.

(3) Lastly, the Friday independent reading & writing activity is similar to the lab session, except that students read and write a Friday Article journal entry entirely on their own, so long as the the entry is uploaded before 11:59pm that Friday. Articles assigned for each Friday are placed on  Blackboard in PDF format for students to download. Everything else about these Friday journal entries is the same as the lab journal entries - content-, length-, and grading-wise. They will be given the same grading weight as the lab entries, as well.

Attendance: Attendance to both the lecture and lab sessions on Mondays & Wednesdays is mandatory - absent/tardy students will be penalized beyond missing a grade for their lab journal entries.

Research paper: Each student will write an individual research paper on a relevant topic of historical sociology or renown author(s).  Prior approval by Dr. Santos is required for each individual paper topic. The papers need to be submitted in electronic form (attached as a Word file) in the course's Blackboard account. The paper is due on Thursday June 13, before noon. The papers can begin to be turned in on Tuesday, June 11, after 8:00am.

Each paper should include a title page and an abstract, then between 8 and 10 pages of text  (excluding the bibliography), a bibliography, and finally an appendix for whatever charts, maps, and figures are included. For a precise guide on the paper's format and citation style, go to:

http://www.csubak.edu/~gsantos/guide-paper.html
Each individual paper should pose a central argument, or thesis, or hypothesis, and include the following sections: an introduction stating the thesis/topic, the theoretical approach and methodological framework of the paper; an analytical section on the relevant historical & contemporary processes, facts, data, related to the topic; this section should not only be descriptive, but it should include your critical analysis to explain these things, as well as other plausible alternative explanations in the literature, and your critique of them; your summary and main conclusions. The bibliography ought to reflect a good search on the World Wide Web, as well as consulted books and scholarly journals in the library. Appendices should include charts, graphs, and figures covering the pertinent topic - the better selected, relevant, and more global in nature, the more valuable.

Plagiarism: To prevent students from wittingly or unwittingly engaging in plagiarism, Dr. Santos strongly recommends students to carefully read and abide by the document CSUB Classifications of Plagiarism found at: http://www.csub.edu/tlc/options/resources/turn_it_in_help_page.shtml
When you submit your papers, you will be automatically checked for plagiarism. Be sure you avoid getting flagged for plagiarism by Blackboard. Anyone found guilty of engaging in plagiarism will automatically fail the course and be reported to the Office of Student Discipline and Judicial Affairs for further disciplinary action.

Grading: The combined lab journal & Friday journal entries (28 total) are worth 70 points (2.5 points each). The research paper is worth 30 points.  Absence/tardiness for the lectures and the labs will be penalized beyond loss of journal entries. Perfect attendance to all lecture and lab sessions will be rewarded with 5 extra points. The final letter grade will be assigned, on a scale of 0 to 100, as follows:

94-100+ = A         84-86 = B            74-76 = C
90- 93 = A-           80-83 = B-           70-73 = C-

87- 89 = B+          77-79 = C+           65-69 = D       < 65 = F

Office Hours and Email Communication with Dr. Santos & Ms. Rafik: Dr. Santos's office hours are posted above - Ms. Rafik will meet only by appointment. Students may communicate with both Dr. Santos & Ms. Rafik by email to the class email address above. Ms. Rafik, who will help grade the lab & Friday journal entries, may also be reached, privately, at her own email address above. Please be advised that email communication has to be very brief and to the point. Expect a one line reply. Always sign off with your FULL NAME - do not assume we know who you are! You may also reach or leave messages for Dr Santos at his office phone (above). If you send an email message to Ms. Rafik requesting an appointment or a call back, please include a phone number.

Schedule of Reading Assignments
Week
Monday
Lecture & Lab
Wednesday
Lecture & Lab
Friday
Assignment
1
April 1, 3
HOLIDAY
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE Marx & Engels. Communist Manifesto
Chapter 1

2
April 8, 10
SKOCPOL
1. Sociology's Historical Imagination

SKOCPOL
2. The Social & Historical Landscape of Marc Bloch

Régis Debray: Socialism: A Life-Cycle
3
April 15, 17
SKOCPOL
3. The Holistic Social Science of Karl Polanyi

SKOCPOL
4. The Historical Sociology of S. N. Eisenstadt

Mike Davis: Planet of Slums
4
April 22, 24
SKOCPOL
5. The Comparative Sociology of R. Bendix

SKOCPOL
6. The historical Sociology of Perry Anderson

Perry Anderson: Two Revolutions
5
April 29,  May 1
SKOCPOL
7. E.P. Thompson: Understanding History

SKOCPOL
8. Charles Tilly: Collective Action

Retort: Afflicted Powers
6
May 6, 8
SKOCPOL
9. The World System of Immanuel Wallerstein

SKOCPOL
10.
The historical Sociology of Barrington Moore
Andre Gunder Frank: Immanuel & Me With-Out Hyphen
7
May 13, 15
SKOCPOL
11. Recurrent Strategies in Historical Sociology

ARRIGHI & SILVER
Introduction

Amelia & Faist: De-naturalizing the national: key concepts of transnational studies in migration
8
May 20, 22
ARRIGHI & SILVER
1. Geopolitics & High Finance: Dutch & British

ARRIGHI & SILVER
1. Geopolitics & High Finance: U.S.
Bloch & Chimienti: Irregular migration in a globalizing world
9
May 27, 29

HOLIDAY
ARRIGHI & SILVER
2. The Transformations of Business Enterprises: Dutch & British

ARRIGHI & SILVER (BOOK)
2. The Transformations of Business Enterprises
: U.S.
10
June 3, 5
ARRIGHI & SILVER
3. The Social Origins of World Hegemonies:
Dutch & British
ARRIGHI & SILVER
3. The Social Origins of World Hegemonies: U.S.
G. Arrighi & Lu Zhang: A New Bandun
11
June 10
ARRIGHI & SILVER
4. Western Hegemonies in World-Historical Perspective & Conclusion

Research Paper due on Thursday, June 13, in Word format,
placed on Blackboard, before noon.